Us Congress House Bill HB1140

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/21/23
• Refer: 2/21/23
• Report Pass: 3/9/23

Caption

To authorize the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to waive application of certain requirements with respect to processing and refining a critical energy resource at a critical energy resource facility, and for other purposes.

Impact

The enactment of HB 1140 will significantly influence existing environmental laws by providing the EPA with enhanced flexibility to bypass established regulations when necessary due to critical energy concerns. Specifically, it enables temporary waivers that could expedite operations at critical energy resource facilities, thereby potentially affecting the environmental standards that govern air quality and waste management. The bill also aims to maintain a balance by suggesting that any waivers should minimize adverse environmental impacts wherever practicable, thereby attempting to reconcile economic needs with environmental protections.

Summary

House Bill 1140 seeks to grant the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the authority to waive certain regulatory requirements under the Clean Air Act and the Solid Waste Disposal Act for the processing and refining of critical energy resources. This measure is aimed at ensuring that the United States can swiftly respond to national security and energy security needs in the event of sudden increases in demand or shortages of these resources. By enabling such waivers, the bill emphasizes the government’s commitment to maintaining energy supply while safeguarding national interests.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HB 1140 is mixed, reflecting a divergence of opinions among stakeholders. Proponents argue that this bill is vital for ensuring national and energy security, arguing that it will provide timely support to energy facilities during crucial periods. On the other hand, critics express concerns that the ability to waive regulatory requirements could lead to environmental degradation and a weakening of protections that are important for public health. This dichotomy underscores a broader debate about the priorities of energy production versus environmental preservation.

Contention

Controversies surrounding HB 1140 primarily center on the potential for regulatory overreach and environmental consequences. Critics argue that allowing waivers without comprehensive oversight could set dangerous precedents for environmental protection and accountability. Furthermore, the concern that such measures could ultimately compromise national environmental laws is a point of significant contention, generating discussions about the responsibilities of the EPA in balancing regulatory compliance with urgent national needs. The bill proposes a path forward that raises important questions about the role of government in managing energy crises and environmental integrity.