| Old | New | Differences | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | I | |
| 2 | 2 | 118THCONGRESS | |
| 3 | 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | STSESSION H. R. 269 | |
| 5 | 5 | To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district of Idaho. | |
| 6 | 6 | IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES | |
| 7 | 7 | JANUARY10, 2023 | |
| 8 | 8 | Mr. S | |
| 9 | 9 | IMPSON(for himself and Mr. FULCHER) introduced the following bill; | |
| 10 | 10 | which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary | |
| 11 | 11 | A BILL | |
| 12 | 12 | To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district | |
| 13 | 13 | of Idaho. | |
| 14 | 14 | Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa-1 | |
| 15 | 15 | tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 2 | |
| 16 | 16 | SECTION 1. DISTRICT JUDGESHIP FOR THE DISTRICT OF 3 | |
| 17 | 17 | IDAHO. 4 | |
| 18 | 18 | (a) I | |
| 19 | 19 | NGENERAL.—The President shall appoint, by 5 | |
| 20 | 20 | and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 1 addi-6 | |
| 21 | 21 | tional district judge for the district of Idaho. 7 | |
| 22 | 22 | (b) T | |
| 23 | 23 | ECHNICAL AND CONFORMINGAMENDMENT.— 8 | |
| 24 | 24 | In order that the table contained in section 133(a) of title 9 | |
| 25 | 25 | 28, United States Code, will reflect the change in the num-10 | |
| 26 | 26 | ber of judgeships authorized by subsection (a), such table 11 | |
| 27 | 27 | VerDate Sep 11 2014 05:35 Jan 20, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H269.IH H269 | |
| 28 | 28 | kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS 2 | |
| 29 | 29 | •HR 269 IH | |
| 30 | 30 | is amended by striking the item relating to Idaho and in-1 | |
| 31 | 31 | serting the following: 2 | |
| 32 | 32 | ‘‘Idaho ............................................................................................. 3’’. | |
| 33 | 33 | Æ | |
| 34 | 34 | VerDate Sep 11 2014 23:18 Jan 20, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6301 E:\BILLS\H269.IH H269 | |
| 35 | 35 | kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS |