Us Congress House Bill HB3506

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/18/23
• Refer: 5/18/23
• Report Pass: 5/24/23
• Engrossed: 11/14/23

Caption

To make technical amendments to update statutory references to certain provisions classified to title 7, title 20, and title 43, United States Code, and to correct related technical errors.

Impact

The impact of HB3506 on state laws primarily revolves around the areas it aims to correct, especially in agricultural and educational legislation. By streamlining references and correcting errors, the bill facilitates a more coherent legal structure, thereby enhancing compliance and administrative efficiency. While the bill does not introduce new regulations or alter existing laws significantly, its amendments are intended to prevent confusion or misinterpretation that could arise from outdated or incorrect statutory references.

Summary

House Bill 3506 is designed to make technical amendments to the United States Code by updating certain statutory references classified under titles 7, 20, and 43. The bill focuses on correcting technical errors in existing legislation to ensure that references are accurate and reflect the current legal framework. This kind of legislative housekeeping is important for maintaining the clarity and integrity of statutory texts, ensuring that affected laws are enforced correctly as intended by the original legislation.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB3506 appears to be positive, as it addresses the need for accuracy in the law. Lawmakers and stakeholders involved in the legislative process have recognized the necessity for technical amendments, which tend to garner bipartisan support. Given the nature of the bill, there is an understanding that such updates are essential for effective governance, even if they do not directly lead to major policy changes.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB3506 seem to revolve around the prioritization of technical fixes versus more substantive legislative reforms. Some critics might argue that the resources spent on amending technical references could be better allocated to addressing pressing issues in agriculture and education. However, proponents counter that maintaining clear and accurate laws is foundational for effective governance and should not be overshadowed by the need for more visible policy initiatives.