Firearm Industry Non-Discrimination Act or the FIND Act This bill prohibits the federal government from entering into contracts with an entity that discriminates against firearm trade associations or businesses that deal in firearms, ammunition, or related products. Specifically, the bill requires a federal agency to include in each contract for the procurement of goods or services awarded by the agency a clause requiring the prime contractor to certify that it (1) has no policy, practice, guidance, or directive that discriminates against a firearm entity or firearm trade association; and (2) will not adopt a policy, practice, guidance, or directive that discriminates against a firearm entity or firearm trade association during the term of the contract. The bill establishes (1) a similar requirement with respect to subcontracts, and (2) penalties for violations. The bill makes such prohibition inapplicable to a contract for the procurement of goods or services that is a sole-source contract.
If enacted, HB53 would require that every federal procurement contract includes a clause mandating the prime contractor to certify that it does not operate any discriminatory policies against firearm entities or trade associations. This statement effectively reinforces the position of the firearm industry within federal contracting systems, making it difficult for government agencies to engage with firms that may refuse to work with or support firearm-related businesses. This act may have implications for how federal agencies assess and engage with suppliers in the firearm sector.
House Bill 53, also known as the Firearm Industry Non-Discrimination Act (FIND Act), is designed to amend title 41 of the United States Code. The primary purpose of this bill is to prohibit the federal government from entering into contracts with any entity that discriminates against firearm or ammunition industries. This legislative measure aims to safeguard businesses and trade associations in the firearm sector by ensuring they have equal opportunities in government contracting processes, free from biases against their industry.
While proponents argue that HB53 will prevent unfair discrimination against lawful businesses operating in the firearm trade and promote an equitable contracting landscape, opponents may view it as a way to bypass regulations aimed at controlling gun sales and ownership. Concerns may arise regarding the potential for promoting firearm access through government contracts and the broader impact on public safety and responsible gun ownership practices. Critics worry the bill may shield businesses from scrutiny that, under current laws, might limit their operational conduct regarding safety and liability.