Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

Us Congress House Bill HB6009

Introduced
10/20/23  
Refer
10/25/23  
Report Pass
12/6/23  

Caption

Restoring American Energy Dominance Act

Impact

The enactment of HB 6009 has the potential to reshape state and national policies around energy production and mineral leasing. Supporters argue it will stimulate domestic energy production, enhance energy independence, and create jobs in the mineral resource sector. Conversely, critics may highlight concerns regarding the environmental implications of increased leasing and the potential negative impacts on local ecosystems. The bill illustrates a broader legislative trend that emphasizes deregulation to facilitate energy production at the possible expense of environmental stewardship.

Summary

House Bill 6009, also known as the Restoring American Energy Dominance Act, aims to require the Director of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to withdraw a recently proposed rule regarding fluid mineral leases and the associated leasing process. The bill mandates that this withdrawal take place within 30 days of its enactment, and prohibits the Director from taking any further actions to finalize or enforce this proposed rule or any similar ones. This proposal reflects a significant shift towards bolstering energy production within the United States by removing regulatory barriers that could limit access to mineral resources.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6009 is largely supportive among proponents of deregulated energy policy, who view it as essential for reestablishing the U.S. as a leader in energy production. However, there are notable concerns amongst environmental advocates regarding the rollback of regulations that could lead to adverse environmental outcomes. The ongoing discourse reflects a fundamental divide between priorities that favor economic progress through resource accessibility and those that prioritize ecological protection and sustainable resource management.

Contention

Potential contention arises from the balance between energy production and environmental responsibility. Critics may argue that the bill undermines necessary environmental protections by facilitating a more aggressive leasing process without adequate oversight. The withdrawal of the proposed BLM rule may be perceived as an abdication of the agency's responsibility to maintain environmental integrity while managing mineral resources. As such, the bill highlights ongoing debates in Congress about the appropriate framework for energy policy and regulation in light of climate considerations.

Companion Bills

US HR1085

Related Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1023) to repeal section 134 of the Clean Air Act, relating to the greenhouse gas reduction fund; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1121) to prohibit a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6009) to require the Director of the Bureau of Land Management to withdraw the proposed rule relating to fluid mineral leases and leasing process, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 86) expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy; providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 987) denouncing the harmful, anti-American energy policies of the Biden administration, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R 7023) to amend section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to codify certain regulatory provisions relating to nationwide permits for dredged or fill material, and for other purposes.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.