Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2024
The legislation, if enacted, would fundamentally alter how regulatory actions are approved at the federal level. It mandates that any major rule, defined as having substantial economic impact, requires a formal approval process by Congress, thereby reducing the executive branch's unilateral regulatory authority. This could lead to significant changes in the operational dynamics between Congress and federal agencies, emphasizing a more centralized oversight of regulatory measures. Critics, however, warn that this may slow down necessary regulations beneficial for public safety and health, as agencies could face delays in implementing urgently needed rules.
House Bill 9648, known as the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2024, aims to amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to require that major rules of the executive branch have no force or effect unless a joint resolution of approval is enacted into law. This bill is intended to enhance accountability and transparency in the federal regulatory process by limiting the power of executive agencies to enact significant rules without Congressional oversight. Proponents argue that this shift will result in more carefully considered regulations, aligning executive actions more closely with legislative intent and public interests.
Key points of contention surrounding HB9648 include concerns about the potential for legislative gridlock and the obstruction of timely regulatory measures that address pressing issues such as environmental protections and public health. Supporters claim it would restore balance by ensuring all regulatory actions are accountable to elected representatives, while opponents fear it may hinder agile responses to emergencies by overcomplicating the rule-making process. The necessity of having a joint resolution of approval for major rules could lead to prolonged periods of unregulated actions, posing risks to public welfare and safety.