Us Congress House Bill HJR117

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/6/24
• Refer: 3/6/24
• Refer: 3/8/24
• Report Pass: 9/18/24

Caption

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Reconsideration of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter".

Impact

If enacted, HJR117 would significantly affect the future of air quality regulations at the federal level, particularly those regarding particulate matter. This disapproval would imply that the current standards put forth by the EPA are not aligned with congressional sentiment, and could lead to a reevaluation or rollback of environmental protections that impact air quality. The resolution represents a legislative move that could signal a shift toward more lenient regulations, which some lawmakers might argue is essential for economic growth.

Summary

HJR117 is a joint resolution aimed at disapproving a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency concerning the reconsideration of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for particulate matter. The resolution seeks to invoke congressional authority under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, effectively rendering the EPA's rule ineffective if the resolution passes. This action is positioned in the context of ongoing discussions about the efficacy and necessity of air quality regulations as they relate to public health and environmental safety.

Contention

The resolution has triggered a range of viewpoints among legislators and stakeholders. Proponents of HJR117 may argue that the EPA's proposed revisions are overly restrictive and could hinder economic development, particularly in industries affected by air quality regulations. Conversely, opponents argue that undermining EPA regulations poses a risk to public health, as particulate matter can lead to severe health issues, including respiratory problems. This divide illustrates the ongoing debate between economic interests and environmental safeguards, highlighting the complexities of governance in managing air quality standards.