Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "New Source Performance Standards for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From New, Modified, and Reconstructed Fossil Fuel-Fired Electric Generating Units; Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Fossil Fuel-Fired Electric Generating Units; and Repeal of the Affordable Clean Energy Rule".
If enacted, HJR163 would effectively invalidate certain restrictive emissions guidelines laid out by the EPA. This measure could lead to a relaxed regulatory environment for energy producers, especially those relying on fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas. Advocates for this resolution argue that it will preserve jobs in the energy sector and maintain lower energy costs for consumers. However, the potential environmental consequences of weakening emissions standards could be significant, drawing opposition from environmental groups.
HJR163 is a joint resolution that expresses congressional disapproval of a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The resolution specifically targets the EPA's 'New Source Performance Standards for Greenhouse Gas Emissions.' It signifies a legislative pushback against regulations intended to manage and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from both new and existing fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. With this resolution, Congress seeks to nullify the EPA’s regulations under the premise that it impacts energy production and economic stability.
The resolution has sparked considerable debate among legislators. Proponents argue for economic growth and energy independence, suggesting that stringent emissions rules hinder the ability of energy providers to operate effectively. Conversely, opponents emphasize the environmental benefits of the EPA's regulations, warning that disapproval of HJR163 could stunt efforts to combat climate change and protect air quality. This illustrates the ongoing tension between economic interests and environmental protection in legislative discussions regarding energy policy.