Us Congress Senate Bill SB1121

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/30/23
• Refer: 3/30/23

Caption

DHS Restrictions on Confucius Institutes and Chinese Entities of Concern Act

Impact

The act stipulates that any institution of higher education must terminate its relationships with Confucius Institutes or specified Chinese entities to remain eligible for funding from the Department of Homeland Security. This significant restriction is aimed at preventing federal resources from being directed toward institutions that might contribute to foreign influence or intelligence activities supposedly detrimental to U.S. interests. Proponents argue that this measure is crucial for safeguarding national security and ensuring that taxpayer dollars are not inadvertently supporting influences with potentially harmful agendas.

Summary

SB1121, titled the 'DHS Restrictions on Confucius Institutes and Chinese Entities of Concern Act', proposes to impose funding restrictions on institutions of higher education that maintain relationships with Confucius Institutes. The bill outlines the definition of Confucius Institutes and associated Chinese entities, particularly those involved in military-civil fusion or providing support to Chinese military or intelligence sectors. The intention is to ensure that federal funds allocated by the Department of Homeland Security do not support educational institutions that are perceived as aligned with any entities that could pose a threat to national security.

Contention

Despite its objectives, SB1121 faces notable contention from various educational and advocacy groups. Critics argue that the bill could lead to an environment where academic freedom is undermined as institutions may be pressured to sever educational partnerships that could be beneficial in fostering cultural exchange. Additionally, there are concerns regarding the implications for U.S.-China educational collaborations, which have historically played a role in enhancing mutual understanding and partnerships in research and education. The broad definitions of the entities involved may also lead to overreach, resulting in excessive caution among institutions, potentially stifling academic discourse and exchange linked to Chinese culture or language programs.