Us Congress Senate Bill SB1912

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/8/23
• Refer: 6/8/23

Caption

ARTICLE ONE Act Assuring that Robust, Thorough, and Informed Congressional Leadership is Exercised Over National Emergencies Act

Impact

If enacted, SB1912 would fundamentally change the process of declaring and managing national emergencies. The bill would amend Title II of the National Emergencies Act to enforce strict requirements on how and when the President can act during such emergencies. By requiring that emergencies be reviewed and approved by Congress, it limits the timeframe in which the President can unilaterally enact emergency powers, thereby fostering a more accountable and transparent government. This legislation aims to restore power to Congress during crises, which is especially crucial in preventing executive overreach.

Summary

SB1912, also known as the ARTICLE ONE Act, aims to enhance congressional oversight of national emergency declarations. The bill requires the President to obtain congressional approval for the declaration of a national emergency and subsequent renewal of such declarations. It establishes a 30-day limit on the initial declaration unless Congress enacts a joint resolution of approval. The aim is to ensure that extraordinary powers granted during emergencies are subject to rigorous checks and balances from the legislature, enhancing the democratic process and preventing potential abuses of power by the executive branch. The bill mandates regular reports from the President to Congress detailing the actions taken during the emergency and the necessity for ongoing authority.

Contention

Debate around SB1912 reflects a wider national conversation about the balance of power between Congress and the presidency. Supporters argue that the bill is necessary to prevent the unchecked expansion of presidential authority during times of emergency, promoting accountability and ensuring that Congress remains an active participant in governance. Critics raise concerns about the practicality of requiring immediate congressional action in urgent situations, fearing that bureaucratic delays could hinder timely responses to national crises. This contention highlights the tension between desires for accountability and the need for swift government action in emergencies.