Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

Us Congress House Bill HB1602

Introduced
2/26/25  
Refer
2/26/25  

Caption

Financial Privacy Act of 2025

Impact

The enactment of HB 1602 is expected to have significant implications on state and federal financial reporting laws. It addresses the vast data collection systems in place under the BSA, which, according to findings, may contain extensive amounts of personal information that is often unrelated to legitimate law enforcement needs. By establishing regular reporting requirements and reviewing access protocols, the bill aims to refine the balance between national security objectives and the civil liberties of U.S. citizens, potentially leading to more tailored and privacy-respecting financial regulations.

Summary

House Bill 1602, officially known as the Financial Privacy Act of 2025, aims to enhance transparency and provide protections concerning reports generated under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). This legislation mandates that the Secretary of the Treasury must report to Congress regarding the number and types of reports filed annually with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), thereby increasing accountability in how financial data is managed and accessed. The bill seeks to ensure that sensitive financial data collected does not unnecessarily infringe upon the privacy rights of individuals.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1602 appears to be mixed. Proponents argue that the bill is a crucial step toward enhancing the privacy rights of individuals while ensuring that any necessary data collection is used appropriately. They view this as a proactive measure to guard against unauthorized disclosures of sensitive information. Conversely, there may be concerns among law enforcement stakeholders regarding the potential complications in combating financial crimes that could arise from increased restrictions and transparency in data handling.

Contention

A notable point of contention within discussions surrounding HB 1602 centers on the tension between privacy rights and the needs of national security. Critics may argue that while the bill provides necessary protections, it might hinder swift access to crucial financial information that supports efforts against illicit finance. The proposed requirement for the Secretary of the Treasury to regularly review and revise protocols could lead to disputes over the extent of transparency required versus the necessity of operational effectiveness in financial oversight activities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB493

District agricultural associations: secretary-managers: compensation.

LA HB528

Reforms the organizational structure for the Department of Transportation and Development including its duties, powers, and responsibilities of officers and employees (EG INCREASE GF EX See Note)

AR SB63

To Amend Arkansas Law Concerning Reports By The Secretaries Of Cabinet-level Departments On The State Of Their Departments.

CA AB655

California-Mexico Border Relations Council.

CA SB297

Elections: initiatives and referenda: withdrawal.

MI HB4268

Campaign finance: violations; secretary of state to apply for injunctive relief; allow. Amends sec. 15 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.215).

CA AB459

Initiatives: qualification: electronic signatures.

IA SF479

A bill for an act relating to documents filed with the secretary of state by business entities, including by authorizing the secretary of state to refuse to file documents or remove information from documents.