Sending Evading Non-Documented Threats Home Especially Migrants Biden Accepted Carelessly and Knowingly Act of 2025 or the SEND THEM BACK Act of 2025This bill subjects non-U.S. nationals (aliens under federal law) who illegally entered the United States on or after January 20, 2021, to expedited removal (i.e., removal without further hearing or review). This applies even if such an individual indicated an intention to apply for asylum or expressed a fear of persecution. The bill does not apply to an individual serving in the Armed Forces as of January 1, 2025.
The impacts of HB 190 on state laws and immigration policy are profound. By facilitating the expedited removal process, the bill reinforces the federal government's authority in addressing illegal immigration by reducing the bureaucratic hurdles that often delay deportations. Proponents believe this will deter future illegal entries by demonstrating a stringent enforcement policy. If implemented, the bill would likely increase the number of deportations while potentially impacting asylum seekers’ rights and protections under U.S. law.
House Bill 190, also known as the SEND THEM BACK Act of 2025, aims to expedite the removal process for certain illegal aliens who entered the United States on or after January 20, 2021. This bill proposes that any alien who falls under this category shall be subject to immediate removal, even if they express an intention to apply for asylum or fear persecution. The bill introduces a significant shift in the handling of immigration cases by limiting the time and processes associated with asylum claims for individuals who entered the country illegally during the specified time frame.
Notable points of contention surrounding HB 190 include concerns from various advocacy groups and human rights organizations regarding the potential violation of asylum seekers' rights. Critics argue that the bill could lead to wrongful deportations and ignore the complex realities of individuals fleeing persecution. Additionally, the legislation includes an exception for members of the U.S. Armed Forces, which has raised questions about equity and fairness in how the law applies to different groups. The debate highlights the ongoing tensions within immigration policy about balancing border security with human rights.