Ending Common Core and Expanding School Choice Act This bill revises requirements related to federal education funding for disadvantaged children. Specifically, the bill (1) eliminates the standards, assessments, and academic accountability requirements for state and local educational agencies that receive federal funds for the education of disadvantaged children; (2) requires such funds to be allocated based on the number of children residing in each state who are living in poverty; and (3) allows educational agencies to distribute per-pupil amounts from such funds to parents for qualified elementary and secondary education expenses. The bill prohibits federal officers or employees from mandating academic standards, assessments, curricula, or accountability systems.
If implemented, HB 83 would significantly alter how federal funding is distributed at the state level. By enabling state educational agencies to allocate federal funds based on the number of eligible low-income children, the bill seeks to support better access to educational resources. This initiative is particularly crucial for families who seek alternatives to traditional public schools, facilitating their ability to choose academic environments that best fit their children's needs while being financially supported.
House Bill 83, known as the 'Ending Common Core and Expanding School Choice Act', aims to amend part A of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. The primary goal of this legislation is to allow federal education funds designated for disadvantaged children to follow them to various types of educational institutions. These institutions include public schools, charter schools, accredited private schools, and supplemental educational service programs, thereby enhancing educational options for low-income families.
The bill's emphasis on school choice and the potential challenge to existing educational standards, particularly the Common Core, has raised concerns among educators and policymakers. Critics argue that the devaluation of standardized curricula could lead to inconsistencies and disparities in educational quality across different schools, particularly affecting students from disadvantaged backgrounds. Supporters, however, claim that the flexibility provided by such a bill will empower families and encourage educational institutions to innovate and cater to diverse learning needs.