Us Congress House Bill HB938

Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/4/25
• Refer: 2/4/25

Caption

No Contracts with Foreign Adversaries Act

Impact

The implications of HB 938 are significant, impacting existing frameworks of international cooperation in educational contexts. This bill will require institutions to be diligent in their dealings with foreign partners and will necessitate a robust compliance structure to ensure adherence to the new prohibitions. Failure to comply could result in severe penalties, including being barred from federal funding programs for extended periods. As this bill moves forward, it is expected to spark a dialogue about the balance between advancing higher education through global partnerships and safeguarding national interests from potential threats posed by foreign adversaries.

Summary

House Bill 938, known as the 'No Contracts with Foreign Adversaries Act,' proposes amendments to the Higher Education Act of 1965 with a focus on restricting contracts between institutions of higher education and designated foreign countries or entities deemed to be a concern for national security. The bill outlines a clear framework prohibiting educational institutions from entering into contracts with these foreign entities unless a specific waiver has been granted by the Secretary of Education, limiting the duration of such waivers to one year. Institutions must submit detailed requests for contracts they wish to engage in with these foreign entities, including compliance certifications, to secure a waiver. These stringent measures are intended to enhance national security by controlling foreign influence in American higher education.

Contention

Various points of contention surrounding HB 938 involve concerns about the scope of the defined 'foreign entities of concern' and the implications for research collaborations that often rely on international partnerships. Critics argue that the bill may hinder academic freedom and limit access to potentially beneficial collaborations that could advance knowledge and research outcomes. Furthermore, the waiver process, while intended to provide some flexibility, is viewed as a bureaucratic hurdle that may dissuade institutions from engaging with international partners altogether. Overall, the dialogue reflects a tension between national security objectives and the open nature of educational institutions.

Congress_id

119-HR-938

Policy_area

Education

Introduced_date

2025-02-04