Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to the authority of Congress and the States to regulate contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections and to enact public financing systems for political campaigns.
Impact
If ratified, this amendment would fundamentally alter the landscape of campaign finance in the United States. It would enable both federal and state governments to enact laws that provide public financing systems, which could help to counterbalance the financial advantages held by wealthier candidates or entities. The intention is to foster a political environment where candidates can compete more equally, potentially leading to a more representative democratic process. Moreover, it includes provisions that would prohibit corporations and other artificial entities from spending money to influence elections, thereby shifting the focus back to individual voters.
Summary
HJR122 proposes an amendment to the Constitution of the United States aimed at allowing Congress and the States to regulate financial contributions and expenditures in political campaigns. This proposed amendment seeks to create regulations that impose reasonable and neutral limitations on the raising and spending of money by candidates and others to influence elections. It also advocates for the establishment of public funding systems for election campaigns to reduce the impact of private wealth in politics and promote fairer electoral competition.
Contention
The discourse surrounding HJR122 is expected to spark significant debate. Proponents of the amendment argue that such regulations are essential for maintaining the integrity of elections and preventing corporate influence from undermining democratic values. Critics, however, may contend that the amendment could infringe upon free speech rights and hinder the ability of individuals and groups to express their political opinions through financial support. The discussions are anticipated to delve deep into constitutional implications, particularly concerning the balance between regulating political contributions and safeguarding free speech.
Same As
A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to the authority of Congress and the States to regulate contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections and to enact public financing systems for political campaigns.
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to the authority of Congress and the States to regulate contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections and to enact public financing systems for political campaigns.
A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to contributions and expenditures intended to affect elections.
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to set limits on Federal campaign contributions and spending, prohibit corporate spending in the political process, require Congress to develop a system of public campaign financing for all Federal candidates who qualify for the ballot, and allow the States to set reasonable limits on campaign contributions and spending in State and local elections, and for other purposes.
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States providing that the rights protected and extended by the Constitution are the rights of natural persons only.
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Credit Card Penalty Fees (Regulation Z)".
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States providing that the rights extended by the Constitution are the rights of natural persons only.
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to temporarily fill vacancies in the House of Representatives to further the continuity of Congress.
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States providing that there is no immunity from criminal prosecution for an act on the grounds that such act was within the constitutional authority or official duties of an individual, and providing that the President may not grant a pardon to himself or herself.