This joint resolution nullifies the final rule issued by the Department of Homeland Security titled Modernizing H–2 Program Requirements, Oversight, and Worker Protections and published on December 18, 2024. This rule modifies several regulations applicable to agricultural (H-2A) and nonagricultural (H-2B) temporary nonimmigrant workers, including by providing additional whistleblower protections for these workers, eliminating the differential treatment of nationals of countries designated as eligible, and establishing a 60-day grace period for workers after the revocation or cessation of eligible employment.
If passed, HJR21 could significantly impact labor and immigration policies surrounding temporary worker programs in the United States. The resolution aims to prevent improvements that the proposed DHS rule could bring to worker protections and program oversight. By disapproving the rule, lawmakers indicate their preference for maintaining existing regulations instead of modernized requirements that may offer increased protections for H-2 workers. This could lead to potential limitations on the panel’s ability to navigate evolving labor market needs that require flexibility in immigration processes.
HJR21 is a joint resolution submitted to the House of Representatives that seeks to disapprove a rule proposed by the Department of Homeland Security regarding the modernization of H-2 program requirements, oversight, and worker protections. The resolution expresses Congress's stance against the rule, asserting that it should have no force or effect. This resolution references the specific Federal Register entry (89 Fed. Reg. 103202) related to the rule in question, indicating that it is a formal action intended to block the implementation of new standards associated with the H-2 visa program.
There may be points of contention surrounding HJR21, particularly between those who advocate for stricter immigration controls and those who argue for more robust worker protections. Proponents of the disapproval may argue that the proposed rule could lead to excessive leniency in the hiring of foreign labor, whereas opponents might claim that it stifles essential reforms aimed at enhancing the rights and safety of temporary workers. The resolution highlights the ongoing debate in Congress regarding immigration reform and the balance between securing borders and providing fair labor practices.