Stop Funding Global Terrorists Act of 2025This bill prohibits the United States from making any voluntary or assessed contributions to the United Nations (UN) for assistance to Afghanistan until the Department of State certifies to Congress that (1) no U.S. funds are used in cash shipments by the UN to Afghanistan, and (2) terrorist organizations do not receive funds as a result of such cash shipments. If the State Department later determines such a certification is inaccurate, it must revoke the certification and notify Congress.
Impact
Should SB313 be enacted, it will significantly alter existing statutes governing U.S. contributions to international organizations, particularly the UN. By imposing strict certification requirements, the bill effectively deprives the UN of essential funding directed towards Afghanistan until clear safeguards are established. This could have ramifications for humanitarian aid and development programs in the region, potentially stifling international efforts aimed at supporting the Afghan people amid ongoing challenges. Moreover, it may lead to a reevaluation of U.S. funding mechanisms for global assistance, aligning them more closely with national security concerns.
Summary
SB313, known as the 'Stop Funding Global Terrorists Act of 2025', seeks to place restrictions on U.S. contributions to the United Nations, specifically in relation to assistance in Afghanistan. The bill stipulates that the U.S. cannot provide any voluntary or assessed contributions to the UN for activities in Afghanistan unless certain conditions are met. The Secretary of State must certify to Congress that U.S. funds are not being utilized in cash shipments to the country, and that no terrorist organizations are benefitting from such transactions. This certification process aims to prevent U.S. taxpayer money from indirectly supporting terrorist activities abroad.
Contention
The key points of contention surrounding SB313 revolve around the balance between national security and humanitarian assistance. Proponents argue that the bill is essential for ensuring that U.S. funds do not inadvertently support terrorism, reflecting a stringent stance towards global organizations perceived as ineffective in managing funds. Critics, on the other hand, are concerned that such restrictive measures could hinder vital humanitarian efforts in Afghanistan, where many citizens are in dire need of assistance. The debate continues to highlight the complex interplay between U.S. foreign policy, humanitarian obligations, and the overarching goal of combating terrorism.
A bill to establish a Joint Select Committee on Afghanistan to conduct a full investigation and compile a joint report on the United States withdrawal from Afghanistan.
A bill to protect the national security of the United States by imposing sanctions with respect to certain persons of the People's Republic of China and prohibiting and requiring notifications with respect to certain investments by United States persons in the People's Republic of China, and for other purposes.
No Taxpayer Funding for the World Health Organization Act This bill prohibits the United States from providing any assessed or voluntary contributions to the World Health Organization.
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the Treasury relating to "Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds".
To support the national defense and economic security of the United States by supporting vessels, ports, and shipyards of the United States and the U.S. maritime workforce.
A bill to require the Secretary of State to submit to Congress classified dissent cables relating to the withdrawal of the United States Armed Forces from Afghanistan.
To amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to require any cost estimate for a bill or joint resolution prepared by the Congressional Budget Office to include the cost to each United States citizen for carrying out such measure, and for other purposes.