Us Congress Senate Bill SB313

Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/29/25
• Refer: 1/29/25

Caption

Stop Funding Global Terrorists Act of 2025This bill prohibits the United States from making any voluntary or assessed contributions to the United Nations (UN) for assistance to Afghanistan until the Department of State certifies to Congress that (1) no U.S. funds are used in cash shipments by the UN to Afghanistan, and (2) terrorist organizations do not receive funds as a result of such cash shipments. If the State Department later determines such a certification is inaccurate, it must revoke the certification and notify Congress.

Impact

Should SB313 be enacted, it will significantly alter existing statutes governing U.S. contributions to international organizations, particularly the UN. By imposing strict certification requirements, the bill effectively deprives the UN of essential funding directed towards Afghanistan until clear safeguards are established. This could have ramifications for humanitarian aid and development programs in the region, potentially stifling international efforts aimed at supporting the Afghan people amid ongoing challenges. Moreover, it may lead to a reevaluation of U.S. funding mechanisms for global assistance, aligning them more closely with national security concerns.

Summary

SB313, known as the 'Stop Funding Global Terrorists Act of 2025', seeks to place restrictions on U.S. contributions to the United Nations, specifically in relation to assistance in Afghanistan. The bill stipulates that the U.S. cannot provide any voluntary or assessed contributions to the UN for activities in Afghanistan unless certain conditions are met. The Secretary of State must certify to Congress that U.S. funds are not being utilized in cash shipments to the country, and that no terrorist organizations are benefitting from such transactions. This certification process aims to prevent U.S. taxpayer money from indirectly supporting terrorist activities abroad.

Contention

The key points of contention surrounding SB313 revolve around the balance between national security and humanitarian assistance. Proponents argue that the bill is essential for ensuring that U.S. funds do not inadvertently support terrorism, reflecting a stringent stance towards global organizations perceived as ineffective in managing funds. Critics, on the other hand, are concerned that such restrictive measures could hinder vital humanitarian efforts in Afghanistan, where many citizens are in dire need of assistance. The debate continues to highlight the complex interplay between U.S. foreign policy, humanitarian obligations, and the overarching goal of combating terrorism.

Congress_id

119-S-313

Policy_area

International Affairs

Introduced_date

2025-01-29