Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

Us Congress Senate Bill SB320

Introduced
1/29/25  

Caption

National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program Reauthorization Act of 2025

Impact

The bill carries significant implications for both state laws and local governance regarding disaster preparedness and building safety. Key provisions include the development of best practices for earthquake risk reduction, which could lead to the establishment of new building codes and standards at the state and local levels. Moreover, there is a particular focus on engaging Tribal governments in the effects of earthquakes, thus recognizing the unique vulnerabilities faced by these communities. The intent is to mitigate earthquake damage and enhance recovery through improved architectural and engineering practices supported by funding.

Summary

SB320, formally known as the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program Reauthorization Act of 2025, seeks to reauthorize and enhance the existing earthquake hazard reduction programs established by the Earthquake Hazards Reduction Act of 1977. This reauthorization aims to improve the United States' preparedness and response to earthquake hazards, acknowledging the significant risk that earthquakes pose to a substantial portion of the nation’s population and infrastructure. The bill emphasizes building and infrastructure resilience, emphasizing the incorporation of updated scientific and technical insights into handling such natural disasters.

Contention

Despite the bill's potential benefits, notable points of contention include the allocation of federal resources and whether states and local jurisdictions will adhere to the guidelines set forth by the federal government. Critics may express concerns about federal overreach into local building regulations, as the bill seeks to establish national standards that could supersede local laws. This balance between federal guidance and local autonomy will likely be a topic of extensive discussion as stakeholders consider how best to protect lives and properties in earthquake-prone areas.

Congress_id

119-S-320

Introduced_date

2025-01-29

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

US HB2568

Earthquake Resilience Act

US HB1849

Disaster Mitigation and Tax Parity Act of 2025

US SB270

Natural Disaster Resilience and Recovery Accountability Act

US HB1787

Roberto Clemente Commemorative Coin Act

US HB339

Broadband Resiliency and Flexible Investment Act

US SB877

Roberto Clemente Commemorative Coin Act

US SB651

Unplug the Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Programs Act

US HB278

Barriers and Regulatory Obstacles Avoids Deployment of Broadband Access and Needs Deregulatory Leadership Act or the BROADBAND Leadership ActThis bill limits the authority of a state or locality to regulate the placement, construction, or modification of telecommunications service facilities.States and localities may not discriminate in such regulations among providers of telecommunications services, including based on the technology used to provide services. In addition, states and localities may not regulate in a manner that effectively prohibits the provision or improvement of interstate or intrastate telecommunications services.However, states and localities may charge reasonable, cost-based fees (1) to review requests to place, construct, or modify telecommunications service facilities; or (2) for the use of property owned or managed by the state or locality for the placement, construction, or modification of those facilities.States or localities must respond to requests to place, construct, or modify facilities and for other related actions by specified deadlines. Such deadlines may only be tolled by a mutual agreement between the applicant and the state or locality, or in the event that the application is incomplete and requires a supplemental submission. If a decision is not made by the deadline, the request is deemed to be approved. Further, denials of requests must be made in writing, supported by evidence, and promptly released to the public.A person adversely affected by an alleged violation of these provisions may petition the courts for expedited review of the actions of the state or locality.