Us Congress Senate Bill SB911

Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/25
• Refer: 3/10/25
• Report Pass: 5/15/25
• Engrossed: 8/1/25

Caption

Chief Herbert D. Proffitt Act of 2025

Impact

The legislation is expected to have a positive impact on retired law enforcement officers and their families by ensuring that they receive support in line with their contributions to public safety. With this amendment, eligible retired officers or their families will have access to benefits that were previously unavailable. The bill not only affirms the sacrifices made by law enforcement officers but also sets a precedent for expanding protections to retired members within the public safety sphere.

Summary

Senate Bill 911, also known as the Chief Herbert D. Proffitt Act of 2025, aims to amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. This legislation includes retired law enforcement officers in the public safety officers’ death benefits program, which recognizes their service and provides support to their families in the event of a death or total disability resulting from a personal injury sustained during their service. This amendment is significant as it broadens the definition of who qualifies for benefits under this act to specifically encompass retired officers who endure targeted attacks as a result of their past service.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 911 is largely favorable, particularly from law enforcement communities and advocacy groups focused on public safety. Supporters argue that this act is a necessary acknowledgment of the dangers faced by law enforcement personnel, even after retirement. They believe it is crucial for society to extend benefits to those who have put their lives on the line for public safety, reaffirming a commitment to honor their service. However, discussions about funding, eligibility criteria, and administrative feasibility could spark contention among lawmakers and stakeholders.

Contention

One point of contention could arise regarding the potential budget implications of expanding the benefits program. Critics may argue about the feasibility and funding methods for the additional financial support required for the inclusion of retired officers in this benefits program. Additionally, there may be discussions surrounding the criteria for what constitutes a personal injury and whether all situations leading to injury should be covered, potentially leading to debates about fairness and the nature of eligibility for benefits.