Utah 2022 Regular Session

Utah House Bill HB0427

Introduced
2/17/22  
Refer
2/22/22  
Report Pass
2/25/22  
Engrossed
2/28/22  
Refer
2/28/22  
Report Pass
3/2/22  
Enrolled
3/14/22  

Caption

Wildlife Accident Protections

Impact

The amendment to the Department of Transportation's reporting requirements can have significant implications on state transportation laws. By requiring the inclusion of wildlife mitigation analysis, the bill ensures that transportation planning is more sensitive to wildlife interactions, which can help reduce accidents and fatalities involving animals. This aspect of the bill could lead to improved strategies in managing wildlife crossings and integrating ecological considerations into road design and maintenance, thus fostering a safer environment for both drivers and wildlife.

Summary

House Bill 427, titled 'Wildlife Accident Protections', aims to amend the annual report requirements from the Department of Transportation to include an analysis of wildlife mitigation efforts. The primary objective of this bill is to enhance safety measures on state transportation systems by addressing the risks associated with wildlife accidents. This legislative change highlights the importance of considering wildlife and environmental issues within the planning and operation of transportation infrastructure.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 427 is generally supportive, particularly among environmental advocates and wildlife agencies who view it as a positive step towards integrating ecological considerations into state transportation practices. Stakeholders have expressed optimism that the inclusion of wildlife mitigation in annual reports will lead to better funding and focus on environmental safeguards within transportation projects. However, there may be some concern regarding the practicality and implementation of such measures, balancing the need for safe transportation with the necessity of protecting wildlife.

Contention

While overall support exists for HB 427, there are discussions regarding the potential challenges in executing wildlife mitigation strategies effectively. Critics may argue about the need for adequate funding and resources to implement the proposed measures, questioning whether the amendment will lead to meaningful change or if it merely serves as a symbolic gesture. Additionally, some members may raise concerns about the administrative burden on the Department of Transportation in fulfilling the enhanced reporting requirements, which could impact its efficiency in addressing immediate transportation needs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

UT HB0309

Wildlife Amendments

UT HB0030

Wildlife Resources Code Recodification

UT HB0031

Wildlife Resources Recodification Cross References

UT HB0382

Wildlife Amendments

UT SB395

Wild game mammals: accidental taking and possession of wildlife: collision with a vehicle: wildlife salvage permits.

UT HB0222

Wildlife Hunting Amendments

UT HB0469

Wildlife Related Amendments

UT HB0222

Access to Traffic Accident Evidence

UT SB0023

Traffic Safety Amendments

UT HB0269

Privacy Protections in Sex-designated Areas

Similar Bills

CA AB2237

Transportation planning: regional transportation improvement plan: sustainable communities strategies: alternative planning strategy: state transportation funding.

CA SB1369

Energy: green electrolytic hydrogen.

CA SB1196

State Transit Assistance Program: eligibility: Anaheim Transportation Network.

HI HB699

Relating To Transportation Network Companies.

HI SB770

Relating To Transportation Network Companies.

CA AB1525

Transportation projects: priority populations.

UT SB0310

Transportation Utility Fee Amendments

TX SB2096

Relating to the creation of and the powers of a comprehensive multimodal urban transportation authority, including the power to impose taxes, issue bonds, and exercise limited eminent domain authority.