Utah 2022 Regular Session

Utah House Bill HB0474

Introduced
2/24/22  
Refer
2/25/22  
Report Pass
3/2/22  

Caption

Municipal and County Land Use and Development Revisions

Impact

The implications of HB 0474 for state laws are significant as it alters procedural aspects related to land use that municipalities must adhere to. The updated provisions allow for a clearer framework in how municipalities can handle petitions presented by citizens or property owners, including those relating to disconnection from municipalities and challenges to land use decisions. Moreover, the bill aims to streamline the approval processes for land developments, potentially hastening the pace of urban growth while also addressing concerns of local governance by providing counties and municipalities with additional tools to manage land use in accordance with evolving community needs.

Summary

House Bill 0474, titled 'Municipal and County Land Use and Development Revisions', revises existing statutes concerning land use, development, and municipal governance in Utah. The bill, sponsored by Chief Sponsor Steve Waldrip, aims to improve the clarity and efficiency of municipal and county land use regulations. Among its key provisions, the legislation modifies various requirements associated with annexation, disconnection requests, and amendment processes regarding public improvements in subdivisions, thereby offering municipalities greater flexibility and authority in land management decisions.

Contention

While there is general support for improving land use regulations, some points of contention arise around concerns that the bill may diminish local control over land use decisions. Critics argue that the bill could inadvertently favor developers and reduce the influence of local voices in the planning processes. Particularly, the provisions regarding nonconforming structures and zoning regulations have prompted discussions about balancing development interests with community integrity and environmental considerations. The legislative discourse included a mix of concerns over potential overreach and the need for ensuring municipalities retain their authority to respond to local land use challenges effectively.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

UT HB0303

Local Land Use Amendments

UT SB0104

Boundary Line Amendments

UT HB0406

Land Use, Development, and Management Act Modifications

RI S1052

Provides that minor subdivisions would include oversized lot subdivisions under certain circumstances and relative to zoning ordinances, permit a modification to allow "neighborhood character-based modifications" under certain circumstances.

VA SB974

Subdivision ordinance; plan review by designated agent, definition of "designated agent."

VA HB2293

Subdivision ordinance; plan review by designated agent.

TX HB2149

Relating to nonconforming land uses after the adoption of or change to a zoning regulation or boundary.

UT HB0243

Riparian Amendments