Utah 2024 Regular Session

Utah House Bill HB0469

Introduced

2/6/24

Refer

2/9/24

Report Pass

2/13/24

Engrossed

2/21/24

Refer

2/22/24

Report Pass

2/26/24

Enrolled

3/11/24

Passed

3/12/24

Caption

Department of Natural Resources Law Enforcement Amendments

Impact

The bill represents a significant amendment to the existing laws regarding natural resource enforcement, replacing outdated terms and clarifying the roles of natural resources officers. Notably, it implements changes in how officers are allowed to search and seize property related to wildlife crimes, aiming to streamline these processes and provide better protection for protected species. This means that officers will have enhanced ability to manage wildlife law violations more effectively, contributing to better conservation efforts within the state. Also included are the reformation of various fees, including those related to aquatic invasive species, to fund prevention and containment efforts.

Summary

House Bill 0469, known as the Department of Natural Resources Law Enforcement Amendments, aims to update various provisions related to the enforcement of natural resources laws in Utah. It seeks to enhance the authority of natural resources officers in enforcing regulations regarding protected wildlife, including the seizure, sale, and preservation of wildlife. The bill provides a clearer framework for officers regarding the handling of wildlife, particularly in instances where wildlife may be subject to criminal charges under state laws. Additionally, the bill identifies specific criteria for what constitutes illegal activities involving wildlife and introduces new definitions to clarify the existing laws.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 0469 appears to be positive among supporters who believe that improved regulation and clarity in law enforcement will lead to better protection of Utah’s wildlife. Proponents assert that the new provisions will enable officers to carry out their duties more effectively and efficiently, thus benefiting the overall state resources and ecological balance. However, there are concerns from some groups about the implications of increased patrols and enforcement that may limit accessibility to wildlife resources or impose burdensome regulations on citizens engaging in recreational activities.

Contention

As this bill moves through the legislative process, notable points of contention include debates surrounding the balance of enforcement power given to natural resources officers versus the rights of citizens. Opponents of greater enforcement authority express fears that this could lead to overreach and potential misuse of power against individuals who may accidentally violate natural resource laws. They advocate for protections ensuring that the updated law does not infringe upon lawful, recreational activities like fishing and hunting on public lands. Furthermore, some community members worry about the financial implications of new fees designed to support the bill's initiatives, potentially affecting local economies.

Latest HB0469 Activity

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

KS SB458

Specifying that certain drug offenses do not give rise to forfeiture under the Kansas standard asset seizure and forfeiture act, providing limitations on state and local law enforcement agency requests for federal adoption of a seizure under the act, requiring probable cause affidavit filing and review to commence forfeiture proceedings, increasing the burden of proof required to forfeit property to clear and convincing evidence, authorizing courts to order payment of attorney fees and costs for certain claimants and requiring the Kansas bureau of investigation to submit forfeiture fund financial reports to the legislature.

KS HB2606

Specifying that certain drug offenses do not give rise to forfeiture under the Kansas standard asset seizure and forfeiture act, requiring courts to make a finding that forfeiture is not excessive, restricting actions prior to commencement of forfeiture proceedings, requiring probable cause affidavit filing and review to commence proceedings, increasing the burden of proof required to forfeit property to clear and convincing evidence and authorizing courts to order payment of attorney fees and costs for certain claimants.

KS SB237

Requiring a criminal conviction for civil asset forfeiture and proof beyond a reasonable doubt that property is subject to forfeiture, remitting proceeds to the state general fund and requiring law enforcement agencies to make forfeiture reports more frequently.

KS HB2396

KS HB2380

Requiring a criminal conviction for civil asset forfeiture, remitting proceeds from civil asset forfeiture to the state general fund, increasing the burden of proof required to forfeit property, making certain property ineligible for forfeiture, providing persons involved in forfeiture proceedings representation by counsel and the ability to demand a jury trial and allowing a person to request a hearing on whether forfeiture is excessive.