Utah 2025 Regular Session

Utah House Bill HB0516

Introduced
2/18/25  
Refer
2/19/25  
Report Pass
2/21/25  
Engrossed
2/27/25  
Refer
2/28/25  
Report Pass
3/4/25  
Enrolled
3/12/25  

Caption

Automobile Franchise Amendments

Impact

The implications of HB 516 are extensive for both automobile manufacturers and franchised dealers. By formally defining 'affiliate' and clarifying the relationships between franchisors and franchisees, the bill aims to enhance transparency and fairness in dealership operations. Notably, the bill includes provisions that could affect how franchisors operate in relation to dealership requirements, specifically emphasizing the prohibition of unreasonable practices, which could help to protect franchisees from coercive tactics in sales and marketing practices.

Summary

House Bill 516, known as the Automobile Franchise Amendments, seeks to amend existing provisions related to automobile franchises within the state of Utah. This bill introduces various definitions and repeals certain provisions, aiming to create a more equitable framework for franchisors and franchisees. Among the key changes is an update to how 'franchise holder' is defined, including amendments that could provide more clarity on the responsibilities of franchisors regarding dealership practices and operations.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 516 appears to be positive among stakeholders who advocate for greater transparency between manufacturers and their dealers. Proponents argue that the bill could mitigate disputes that arise from current vague regulatory language and could foster a better working relationship between parties. However, some opposition may arise from those concerned about the potential for overly restrictive stipulations that could hinder a franchisor's ability to implement necessary operational changes.

Contention

The bill touches on several contentious points, particularly around franchisor authority and dealer autonomy. Critics may voice concerns regarding the balance of power between manufacturers and dealers, particularly in aspects of compliance and operational mandates. Any perceived overreach in prohibiting franchisor activities might generate pushback from manufacturers that seek flexibility in dealership management. The nuances of the amendments will be closely watched as they may set precedent for future legislative measures impacting auto franchise laws.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

UT SB0090

Automobile Franchise Amendments

OH SB306

Modify the Motor Vehicle Sales Law re: recreational vehicles

UT SB0204

Automobile Amendments

MO SB1358

Modifies provisions relating to vehicle dealers

NJ A1288

Revises law concerning the rights and responsibilities of motor vehicle franchisees and franchisors.

NJ A2752

Revises law concerning the rights and responsibilities of motor vehicle franchisees and franchisors.

NJ S3309

Establishes "Motor Vehicle Open Recall Notice and Fair Compensation Act."

NJ A4380

Establishes "Motor Vehicle Open Recall Notice and Repair Compensation Act"; revises motor vehicle franchise agreements.