Virginia Senate Bill SB703

Virginia 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/21/22
• Refer: 1/21/22
• Report Pass: 1/26/22
• Report Pass: 2/9/22
• Engrossed: 2/11/22
• Refer: 2/22/22
• Report Pass: 3/3/22
• Engrossed: 3/8/22
• Engrossed: 3/11/22
• Enrolled: 3/21/22
• Chaptered: 4/8/22
• Passed: 4/8/22

Caption

Information Technology Advisory Council; membership, powers and duties, report.

Impact

The passage of SB703 is anticipated to significantly modernize the operational landscape of information technology across Virginia’s state agencies. By creating frameworks for prioritizing, budgeting, and monitoring technology applications, the bill encourages transparency and accountability in how public funds are utilized for IT expenses. The established Technology Infrastructure Fund will provide essential financial support for major IT projects, thereby bolstering the overall efficacy of state administration through technological advancement.

Summary

Senate Bill 703 seeks to amend provisions related to the Information Technology Advisory Council (ITAC) in Virginia, defining its membership, powers, duties, and the establishment of a corresponding Technology Infrastructure Fund. This bill aims to enhance the state's utilization of information technology in governance, focusing on increased efficiency and improved cybersecurity within state agencies. By establishing clear standards and advisory capabilities, the ITAC is tasked with advising the Chief Information Officer (CIO) on various major IT projects and initiatives, ensuring adherence to statewide technical and data standards.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB703 seems to be constructive, with a recognition of the necessity for updated governance structures to address contemporary IT challenges. Supporters of the bill emphasize the importance of strong cybersecurity measures as the state increasingly relies on digital solutions. However, some concerns were raised regarding the adequacy of resources allocated to support the outlined initiatives, particularly in light of budget constraints faced by state agencies. The general atmosphere throughout discussions suggested cautious optimism about the bill's potential.

Contention

Key points of contention emerged around the degree of independence granted to the ITAC versus oversight by the legislature and the CIO. Some legislators expressed concerns that the ITAC's advisory role may lead to an over-reliance on technology solutions without sufficient political accountability or community input. Discussions highlighted the delicate balance necessary to ensure that the governance of information technology remains responsive to the citizens' needs while embracing modernization within state operations.