Virginia 2025 Regular Session

Virginia House Bill HB1923

Introduced
1/6/25  
Refer
1/6/25  
Report Pass
1/23/25  
Report Pass
1/31/25  
Engrossed
2/3/25  
Engrossed
2/4/25  
Refer
2/5/25  
Report Pass
2/10/25  
Engrossed
2/13/25  
Engrossed
2/21/25  
Engrossed
2/21/25  

Caption

Health insurance; reimbursement for services rendered by certain practitioners, etc.

Impact

If passed, HB1923 would significantly enhance the reimbursement framework for health services delivered by a range of licensed practitioners, thereby aligning the reimbursement policies more closely with the services performed. It ensures that reimbursement is not denied based on the practitioner's professional title, provided they operate within the scope of their licensing agreements. This would likely lead to improved healthcare access for patients seeking services from these professionals and potentially reduce healthcare service gaps.

Summary

House Bill 1923 seeks to amend the Code of Virginia regarding reimbursement for services provided by certain licensed practitioners other than physicians. The bill specifically aims to ensure that health insurance policies cannot deny coverage for services carried out by specified practitioners, which include various healthcare providers such as chiropractors, physical therapists, and midwives. This change reflects a broader trend in health policy towards inclusivity of non-physician healthcare providers in insurance reimbursement structures.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB1923 appears to be largely positive among proponents who advocate for comprehensive healthcare access through the coverage of various practitioners. Supporters highlight the importance of recognizing the contributions of non-physician healthcare providers and believe that enabling reimbursement for their services can lead to better patient outcomes. However, there may be apprehensions from some traditional healthcare providers who could view this as a dilution of physician-led care.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB1923 may arise from concerns about the quality and standardization of care provided by non-physician practitioners. Critics might argue that while expanding reimbursement options is beneficial, it could lead to variability in service quality. Furthermore, there may be discussions around the potential implications for insurance costs and the necessity of retaining rigorous standards to ensure patient safety across all types of healthcare services.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1429

Behavioral health reimbursement.

NV AB511

Revises provisions relating to insurance. (BDR 57-697)

NJ S3837

Requires NJ FamilyCare to reimburse inpatient providers for long-acting injectable antipsychotic drugs at outpatient reimbursement rate.

CA AB964

Commission on State Mandates: state mandates.

SC H4305

Wellness reimbursement program

TX HB5186

Relating to the establishment of the state health benefit plan reimbursement review board and the reimbursement for health care services or supplies provided under certain state-funded health benefit plans.

TX HB3496

Relating to a health reimbursement arrangement program for certain eligible retirees covered by the Employees Retirement System, the Teacher Retirement System, and the University of Texas and Texas A&M Uniform Benefits.

DE HB91

An Act To Amend Title 14 Of The Delaware Code Relating To School Meals.