Virginia 2025 Regular Session

Virginia House Bill HB2040

Introduced
1/7/25  
Refer
1/7/25  
Report Pass
1/28/25  
Engrossed
1/31/25  
Engrossed
1/31/25  
Refer
2/4/25  
Report Pass
2/13/25  
Engrossed
2/18/25  
Engrossed
2/19/25  
Enrolled
3/7/25  

Caption

Speech-language pathology assistants; licensure, qualifications, scope of practice.

Impact

The implementation of HB2040 is expected to enhance the regulatory structure governing speech-language pathology assistants within the state. By formalizing licensure, the bill aims to ensure that assistants meet standardized qualifications, which can potentially improve the quality of care provided to patients. The establishment of clear guidelines regarding the scope of practice may also help mitigate the risk of malpractice and ensure that those practicing are deemed competent by professional standards set by the state regulatory board.

Summary

House Bill 2040 provides a comprehensive framework for the licensure of speech-language pathology assistants in Virginia. The bill establishes the qualifications required for applicants to obtain a license, which includes completing a Board-approved education pathway and obtaining supervised clinical experience. It outlines the specific duties that these assistants can perform, emphasizing that they must operate under the supervision of licensed speech-language pathologists, ensuring a level of professional oversight and patient safety in their practice.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB2040 is largely positive among healthcare professionals and advocates for speech and language services. Supporters argue that the bill will help to elevate the standards in the profession and provide clarity on the roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathology assistants. Skeptics, however, may raise concerns about the qualifications needed for licensure and how those might affect the supply of qualified professionals in the field, particularly in areas where such specialists are already in short supply.

Contention

One notable point of contention within the discussions surrounding HB2040 revolves around the balance of responsibilities between speech-language pathology assistants and licensed professionals. Critics of the bill may argue that strict supervision and defined scopes of practice could limit the potential for assistants to grow in their roles and contribute effectively to patient care. Furthermore, the requirement for continuing education to maintain licensure might be viewed as a hurdle for some current professionals who may not have the resources to complete additional training.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CO HB1075

Regulate Speech-Language Pathology Assistants

MN SF1534

Speech language pathology assistants requirements clarification provision, amending licensure fees, and appropriation

MN HF1825

Requirements for speech language pathology assistants clarified.

RI H5557

Establishes prevailing standards and procedures for licensing speech-language pathologists and audiologists in Rhode Island.

RI S0471

Establishes prevailing standards and procedures for licensing speech-language pathologists and audiologists in Rhode Island.

NM SB502

Speech-language Pathologist Licensure

NM HB180

Speech Language Pathology License

AL HB441

Alabama Board of Examiners for Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, minimum educational qualifications for speech-language pathology assistant provided