Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB217

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/20/23
• Refer: 4/20/23
• Report Pass: 12/1/23
• Refer: 12/1/23
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Whip lights on all-terrain and utility terrain vehicles.

Impact

The bill's introduction and potential passage reflect an evolution in laws governing off-road vehicle operations. Supporters argue that the inclusion of whip lights, which can enhance visibility for safety, is a progressive measure that aligns with modern vehicle accessory trends. The bill is seen as a way to improve awareness and reduce accidents, particularly in recreational areas where these vehicles are commonly used. This change aims to broaden the recreational utility of ATVs and UTVs while improving the safety of their operation by making them more visible to others both on and off the road.

Summary

Assembly Bill 217 seeks to authorize the use of whip lights on all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) and utility terrain vehicles (UTVs) in Wisconsin. The current law restricts the operation of these vehicles to certain lighting specifications, mainly allowing lights of white or amber color visible from the front and red, yellow, or white visible from the rear. If enacted, AB217 would amend this statute by permitting ATVs and UTVs to be equipped with whip lights that emit any color of light, provided they do not flash red or blue. The whip light is defined specifically in the bill, emphasizing their visibility from multiple angles for safety purposes.

Contention

However, AB217 may face scrutiny regarding the implications of allowing varied lighting on ATVs and UTVs. Critics may argue that while the intention is to improve safety, the introduction of non-standard lighting could lead to confusion or misinterpretation of vehicle signals on public roads or shared spaces. There are concerns that the allowance of multiple colors – beyond the regulated limitations – might complicate enforcement of existing traffic laws and lead to potential hazards in specific situations. The balancing act between enhancing recreational functionality and maintaining clear vehicle regulation may become a focal point of debate as the bill progresses.