Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB298

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/25/23
• Refer: 5/25/23
• Report Pass: 11/3/23
• Refer: 11/3/23
• Engrossed: 11/9/23
• Refer: 11/13/23
• Enrolled: 2/19/24
• Chaptered: 3/21/24
• Passed: 3/21/24

Caption

Polling place closures.

Impact

The implementation of AB298 will have substantial implications for election administration in Wisconsin. By limiting the ability of municipalities to close polling places, the bill seeks to protect voter access and reduce confusion on election day. Additionally, it necessitates public notification for any changes in polling locations, enhancing transparency in the electoral process. This could potentially lead to increased voter turnout, as stability in polling locations is often associated with higher participation rates.

Summary

AB298 introduces significant changes to the regulations surrounding polling place closures in Wisconsin. The bill mandates that polling places must be established at least 30 days prior to an election and delineates stringent conditions under which these polling places can be closed. Specifically, closures on election day are restricted unless there is an emergency situation deemed necessary by a majority of the governing body of the municipality, as well as the approval of the municipal clerk. This requirement aims to ensure that electoral access is maintained and that voters are adequately informed about polling place changes.

Sentiment

General sentiment around AB298 appears supportive, with many viewing the bill as a positive step toward safeguarding voter access and ensuring reliable polling procedures. Proponents, including advocacy groups focused on voter rights, celebrate the stricter regulations on polling place closures as a necessary reform to eliminate potential barriers to voting. However, there may be some concerns voiced by municipalities regarding the added responsibilities and limitations imposed on their ability to manage local elections.

Contention

While AB298 is largely viewed as a protective measure for voters, some local government officials may express concerns about the operational challenges and bureaucracy that this bill introduces. There may be debates around the practicality of enforcing such regulations and the balance between maintaining local control of elections and ensuring a standardized approach to polling place management. As such, while the bill has strong support, it may not be without its critics and discussions regarding its long-term effects on local governance.