Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB400

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/6/23
• Refer: 9/6/23
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Prorated University of Wisconsin System housing and meal plan contracts. (FE)

Impact

The introduction of AB400 is significant as it addresses student rights by mandating transparency in the contract process. Should a student be barred from accessing their housing or meal plan due to reasons not instigated by their conduct (e.g., public health emergencies or institutional closures), they will be eligible for reimbursement of the unused portion of their contract. Moreover, any reimbursements issued must come with a detailed statement clarifying the amounts and calculations involved, thus promoting accountability and clarity.

Summary

Assembly Bill 400 (AB400) aims to amend the statutes regarding housing and meal plan contracts within the University of Wisconsin System. The bill stipulates that the Board of Regents and affiliated institutions must provide prorated contracts to students who are unable to access housing or meal plan benefits for more than seven days due to circumstances outside their control. This provision ensures that students do not face financial penalties when state-imposed regulations or institutional policies prevent them from occupying or utilizing their contracted services.

Conclusion

Overall, AB400 represents a progressive step toward safeguarding the financial interests of students within the University of Wisconsin System. However, ongoing discussions regarding its impact on institutional policies and the operational challenges it poses will be essential in shaping its final form and ensuring it effectively meets the needs of students.

Contention

While the bill received support due to its focus on protecting students financially, points of contention may arise regarding the definition of circumstances deemed 'outside a student's control.' There could be concerns about how institutions will navigate disciplinary actions that involve financial penalties related to misconduct, as the bill explicitly excludes these from the protections it offers. Additionally, the administrative burden of calculating prorated amounts and issuing statements might be a concern for the institutions involved, potentially complicating its implementation.