Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB467

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/5/23
• Refer: 10/5/23
• Report Pass: 2/13/24
• Refer: 2/13/24
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Crisis urgent care and observation facilities and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Summary

Assembly Bill 467 (AB467) aims to establish a framework for crisis urgent care and observation facilities in Wisconsin. The bill mandates the Department of Health Services (DHS) to create a certification process for these facilities, which will focus on providing immediate care to individuals facing mental health crises or substance use disorders. These facilities aim to prevent and treat crises through effective de-escalation and support services tailored to individual needs. Additionally, the bill outlines a grant program to develop and sustain such facilities, enhancing statewide access to mental health resources. Under AB467, a certified crisis urgent care and observation facility is defined as a specialized treatment center equipped to admit individuals for evaluation and intervention concerning mental health and substance use issues. The bill stipulates that all facilities must obtain DHS certification and outlines the procedures that must be followed to maintain proper care and safety protocols. Notably, these facilities are not classified as hospitals and therefore will not be subject to hospital-specific regulations, allowing for flexibility while ensuring essential safety measures are adhered to. The legislation places heavy emphasis on coordination with other community services, particularly those funded through recent opioid litigation settlements. Facilities are required to work closely with any related programs to streamline services and support individuals effectively. There are also specific guidelines on accepting admissions, which include voluntary and involuntary options, thereby ensuring individuals can receive timely care when they need it most. The bill has sparked dialogue among stakeholders regarding its implications on existing healthcare frameworks and service providers. While proponents argue that reducing barriers to access will facilitate better care for at-risk individuals, critics raise concerns about the adequacy of support and resources that will be available within these new facilities. The ongoing discussions highlight a need for careful implementation to balance regulation while ensuring that facilities remain accessible and equipped to meet the demands of the populations they serve.