Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB551

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/23/23
• Refer: 10/23/23
• Report Pass: 11/2/23
• Refer: 11/2/23
• Engrossed: 11/7/23
• Refer: 11/9/23
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Freedom of speech and of the press in school-sponsored media.

Impact

The implementation of AB551 would significantly alter the legal landscape surrounding student journalism in Wisconsin. By prohibiting prior restraint on school-sponsored media, the bill aims to foster a more open and expressive student body. Schools are required to enact policies that not only allow but also protect the free press rights of students. This could lead to an increase in the diversity of viewpoints represented in school media, as students may feel more empowered to express opinions and report on issues affecting their communities without fear of censorship or reprisal.

Summary

Assembly Bill 551 is legislation aimed at enhancing the protection and rights of student journalists in Wisconsin. It establishes clear guidelines ensuring that students enrolled in public schools and the University of Wisconsin System have the right to exercise freedom of speech and of the press in school-sponsored media without prior restraint from school officials. The bill mandates that the school officials cannot impose disciplinary actions against student journalists or media advisers for actions taken in accordance with this legislation. This includes allowing pupil journalists to determine the content of the media while ensuring a process for appeal in case of disputes.

Contention

While supporters argue that AB551 is a necessary step towards enhancing free expression in educational settings, opponents may raise concerns about the implications for school governance and discipline. Critics may argue that without certain restraints, there could be risks associated with inappropriate content being published or distributed among minors. Furthermore, the bill may put schools in a position where they could face legal challenges regarding content that they might find objectionable, increasing their potential liability. The overall debate centers around balancing the rights of students with the responsibilities of educational institutions.