Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB885

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/2/24
• Refer: 1/2/24
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Chronic wasting disease sampling and making an appropriation. (FE)

Impact

If enacted, AB885 will have a significant impact on state laws pertaining to wildlife management. The bill allocates $200,000 in funding over the fiscal years 2023-2025 specifically for the establishment and operation of these sampling kiosks. Additionally, it grants the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) the authority to contract with private entities for the sampling process, thereby potentially reducing the burden on governmental resources while increasing the efficiency of CWD testing. This legislative move reflects an awareness of both ecological conservation and hunter interests in maintaining healthy deer populations.

Summary

Assembly Bill 885, introduced in 2023, focuses on addressing the management of chronic wasting disease (CWD) in cervids, such as deer and elk. The bill aims to codify the program for self-service CWD sampling kiosks, allowing hunters to deposit deer carcass parts for testing. This initiative is part of a broader response to the growing threats that CWD poses to wildlife populations and hunting practices in Wisconsin. By streamlining testing processes, AB885 seeks to enhance the state's ability to monitor and manage CWD effectively.

Contention

Despite the benefits proposed by AB885, there may be points of contention surrounding its implementation. Various stakeholders may have differing opinions on the efficacy and necessity of such self-service kiosks. Concerns could arise regarding the financial implications of contracting private entities for testing, and whether this approach ensures the same level of reliability as in-house testing by state employees. Debate may also take place over how accessible these kiosks will be for hunters, especially in rural areas where hunting is a prominent activity. Additionally, the transition to a more privatized aspect of wildlife testing could evoke discussions about the role of government in wildlife management and conservation efforts.