Eligibility for local office following removal.
The implications of AB95 are significant, particularly for local governance in Wisconsin. By enacting this bill, the procedure for reinstating eligibility post-removal will be formalized, requiring a public hearing where the official can defend their actions. This reform could deter officials from attempting to resign in the face of potential removal or from misusing their positions without consequences. The bill embeds accountability measures within the statutory framework for local governance, emphasizing the integrity expected of elected officials.
Assembly Bill 95 aims to amend laws regarding the eligibility of elected officials in Wisconsin who have been removed from office or who resign during a removal proceeding. The bill states that any elected official of a city, village, town, or county who is removed for cause will not be eligible to fill the vacancy created by their removal. Moreover, officials who resign under certain conditions will also face similar eligibility restrictions unless they can demonstrate otherwise during a hearing. This legislative change is aimed at reinforcing accountability among public officials and ensuring that those who are removed for cause cannot readily return to their positions.
Discussions surrounding AB95 are likely to revolve around the balance between accountability and fairness. Proponents argue that the bill promotes good governance by ensuring officials who are removed for misconduct cannot easily regain their positions, thereby protecting the interests of the public. Critics may contend that the bill imposes too rigid a framework that could hinder due process for officials under removal proceedings. There will be concerns about the fair application of the eligibility criteria, especially regarding the interpretation of 'cause' and the conditions under which restoration can occur.