Wisconsin Senate Bill SB1069

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/26/24
• Refer: 2/26/24
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Preference in state and local government contracts and procurement for materials manufactured in the United States and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Impact

The implications of SB1069 on existing state laws are significant, as it amends statutes to prioritize American-made materials in public procurement processes. State agencies and local governments will be required to navigate this new requirement when drafting contracts. The changes aim to create jobs and strengthen U.S. manufacturing, potentially reshaping how public projects are financed and implemented. However, this requirement may lead to increased costs and procurement complexities if domestic materials are not readily available or competitively priced for some projects.

Summary

Senate Bill 1069 aims to establish a strong preference for materials manufactured in the United States when state and local governments enter contracts for public works and improvements. The legislation requires that contracts stipulate the use of domestically manufactured materials, reflecting a growing national sentiment to bolster domestic industries and reduce reliance on foreign suppliers. This mandate applies under most circumstances, with specific exemptions outlined in the bill. The goal is to enhance local economies and promote domestic production by ensuring taxpayer dollars support American manufacturers.

Contention

While the bill garners support for its intentions to enhance local economies, it has raised points of contention regarding its practicality and implications for public project execution. Critics argue that imposing a strict domestic preference could create challenges, especially if certain materials are scarce because of market conditions or logistical hurdles. Furthermore, there are concerns about maintaining a balance between promoting domestic industry and ensuring that taxpayers get the best value for their investments. The potential for elevated costs and time delays if supplies of American-made materials are not consistent could also lead to criticisms about the bill's feasibility.