California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB852

Introduced
1/13/20  
Introduced
1/13/20  
Refer
1/22/20  
Refer
1/22/20  
Refer
3/16/20  
Refer
5/11/20  
Refer
5/11/20  
Report Pass
5/18/20  
Refer
5/19/20  
Report Pass
6/18/20  
Report Pass
6/18/20  
Engrossed
6/25/20  
Engrossed
6/25/20  
Refer
6/29/20  
Refer
6/29/20  
Refer
8/3/20  
Refer
8/5/20  
Refer
8/5/20  
Report Pass
8/12/20  
Report Pass
8/12/20  
Refer
8/13/20  
Refer
8/13/20  
Report Pass
8/20/20  
Report Pass
8/20/20  
Enrolled
8/31/20  
Enrolled
8/31/20  
Chaptered
9/28/20  
Chaptered
9/28/20  
Passed
9/28/20  

Caption

Health care: prescription drugs.

Impact

The implementation of SB 852 is expected to significantly affect the regulations surrounding health care and prescription drug prices within the state. The bill removes certain proprietary information about drug pricing from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act to protect confidential financial data from public scrutiny. Additionally, CHHSA is mandated to produce reports analyzing the feasibility of manufacturing generics directly, which can change how generic drugs are sourced and priced in California, making medications more accessible to residents.

Summary

Senate Bill 852, known as the California Affordable Drug Manufacturing Act of 2020, aims to enhance patient access to affordable prescription drugs, specifically targeting the production and distribution of generic drugs, including insulin. The bill directs the California Health and Human Services Agency (CHHSA) to collaborate with other departments to form partnerships that would enable the identification, manufacturing, and pricing of generic drugs to lower costs for both public and private purchasers. This move is prompted by ongoing concerns regarding the high costs of prescription medication in California, particularly the need for affordable insulin options for patients suffering from diabetes.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 852 is largely supportive among health care advocates and legislators who see it as a necessary legislative measure to combat high drug costs. However, there are concerns about the implications of restricting public access to drug pricing information, seen as a vital factor in ensuring transparency in health care. Additionally, while many stakeholders view the partnerships for manufacturing drugs as a positive step, there is also skepticism regarding the state’s direct involvement in drug production and its potential effects on existing pharmaceutical market dynamics.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between protecting proprietary business information and maintaining public transparency in government dealings, especially regarding health care. Critics may argue that the limitation on public access could prevent necessary oversight and accountability, while supporters might contend that such protection is essential for encouraging manufacturers to provide pricing information without fear of competitive disadvantage. Additionally, the bill's effectiveness in genuinely reducing drug prices remains a topic of debate, particularly in how CHHSA will prioritize which drugs to produce and the methods through which they will achieve cost savings.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB838

Health care: prescription drugs.

AZ HB2245

Generic prescription drugs; manufacturing

CA AB315

Pharmacy benefit management.

CA SB1361

Prescription drugs: cost sharing: pharmacy benefit managers.

CA AB910

Pharmacy benefit management.

CA AB458

Importation of prescription drugs.

CA SB41

Pharmacy benefits.

IL HB3256

AFFORDABLE DRUG MANUFACTURING