Wisconsin Senate Bill SB247

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/20/23
• Refer: 4/20/23
• Report Pass: 6/2/23
• Engrossed: 6/7/23
• Enrolled: 6/15/23
• Chaptered: 6/22/23
• Passed: 6/22/23

Caption

An agricultural roads improvement grant program and making an appropriation. (FE)

Impact

This bill significantly alters state law by creating a defined funding mechanism dedicated to agricultural infrastructure improvement. The new grant program will allow for more streamlined development of roads essential for agricultural production, potentially leading to increased efficiency and lower operational costs for agricultural businesses. By focusing on local roads classified as either local roads or minor collectors, the bill emphasizes the importance of addressing foundational transportation needs that directly affect the agricultural sector.

Summary

Senate Bill 247 establishes a grant program aimed at improving agricultural roads in Wisconsin. The bill mandates the Department of Transportation to administer grants to reimburse political subdivisions for costs associated with qualifying agricultural road projects. The overarching goal is to enhance the accessibility of agricultural lands and facilities, reducing costs for agricultural producers through better road infrastructure. These grants may cover up to 90% of reimbursable costs related to the planning, engineering, and improvement of designated local roads and bridges.

Sentiment

Generally, the sentiment around SB 247 appears to be supportive, particularly among agricultural stakeholders who stand to benefit from improved access to their production facilities. Proponents argue that the bill represents a headway toward modernizing the infrastructure necessary for agriculture, thereby boosting productivity and the economy. However, there may be concerns regarding the allocation of funds and the bureaucratic processes associated with applying for and receiving grants.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the criteria for project eligibility and the potential bureaucratic overhead involved in the grant application process. Some legislators may fear that the stringent application requirements could limit access for smaller political subdivisions with fewer resources. Additionally, the long-term sustainability of funding and whether sufficient financial resources will be available to meet demand could be areas of debate as the program is implemented.