Wisconsin Senate Bill SB408

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/8/23
• Refer: 9/8/23
• Report Pass: 11/8/23
• Engrossed: 11/14/23
• Refer: 1/22/24
• Enrolled: 1/30/24
• Engrossed: 2/20/24
• Enrolled: 2/29/24
• Chaptered: 3/8/24
• Passed: 3/8/24

Caption

Public funds for substantially identical materials distributed by state senators and representatives to the assembly prior to a general election and providing a penalty.

Impact

This legislation aims to tighten the controls on how public funds can be utilized during election periods and seeks to prevent the misuse of taxpayer money for campaign materials. By imposing these limits, the bill signifies a shift in the state’s approach towards campaign financing and transparency. The amendments created under SB408 also include penalties for violations, which range from formal warnings to monetary forfeitures based on the timing of the violation which signals a strict compliance framework.

Summary

Senate Bill 408, also known as the Wisconsin Act 105, introduces new regulations concerning the use of public funds by state legislators for distributing substantially identical materials during elections. Specifically, the bill prohibits individuals elected to state or local office from using public funds for the distribution of over 50 identical pieces of material prior to elections. Furthermore, it sets even more stringent limits for state senators, allowing up to 150 pieces only when they become candidates at a partisan election after the nomination paper filing deadline.

Sentiment

Initial sentiments regarding SB408 have illustrated a divide among legislators. Supporters advocate that these measures will enhance accountability and promote fair competition during elections by limiting how public resources can be leveraged for political gain. Critics, however, argue that these restrictions could unduly hinder communication from elected officials to their constituents, especially during crucial election periods when information dissemination is vital.

Contention

The notable contention surrounding SB408 includes debates on the appropriateness and effectiveness of such spending limits on public funds. Advocates for the bill see it as a step towards eliminating the potential misuse of resources, claiming it fosters integrity within the electoral process. On the contrary, detractors question if such limits might restrict vital communication from officials during elections, suggesting that the challenges of compliance could outweigh the intended benefits of the legislation.