Wisconsin Senate Bill SB126

Wisconsin 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/14/25
• Refer: 3/14/25
• Report Pass: 4/16/25
• Engrossed: 4/22/25
• Refer: 5/7/25
• Refer: 5/9/25
• Enrolled: 5/16/25
• Chaptered: 6/10/25
• Passed: 6/10/25

Caption

The effective date of certain provisions contained in 2023 Wisconsin Act 126.

Impact

The implications of SB126 on state laws are significant, as it reinforces the confidentiality of sensitive information pertaining to election officials. By restricting access to their personal information, the bill aims to protect these individuals from potential harassment or intimidation, which has become a growing concern in the current political climate. The bill alters previous public records laws, thereby enhancing the focus on the security and privacy of election-related personnel.

Summary

Senate Bill 126 focuses on amending existing legislation related to the confidentiality of election officials' personal information. The bill specifically addresses provisions of the 2023 Wisconsin Act 126 concerning the public records exceptions for election officials and election registration officials. It specifies that personal identifiable information of these officials shall not be disclosed unless explicitly authorized by law, aiming to enhance privacy protection for individuals serving in electoral roles.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB126 appears to be supportive among those who prioritize the privacy and safety of election workers. Proponents argue that bolstering protections for these individuals is necessary to maintain the integrity of the electoral process and to avoid discouragement in civic engagement. Opponents may argue that limiting access to such records could impede transparency in government and electoral processes, posing a potential challenge to public accountability.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB126 include the balance between the right to privacy and the public's right to know. While supporters emphasize the need to protect election officials from undue scrutiny and potential threats, critics may express concerns about the implications for transparency and public oversight of electoral operations. The bill is positioned as a vital step in safeguarding those involved in the electoral process, yet it raises questions about the accessibility of government-related information.