The distribution of certain material on the Internet.
The introduction of SB 130 could significantly change how online platforms operate regarding content access and distribution, particularly sites hosting adult material. By mandating that businesses verify the age of users attempting to access such material, the bill aims to protect minors from exposure to explicit content. Failure to comply with the age verification requirement not only subjects businesses to civil liability for damages but also restricts access from certain IP addresses linked to virtual private networks (VPNs). This could limit the anonymity of users and alter how content can be shared and accessed online.
Senate Bill 130, introduced by Senators Wanggaard, Feyen, Jacque, and Nass, aims to regulate the distribution of potentially harmful material to minors on the internet. The bill emphasizes the responsibility of business entities to implement reasonable age verification methods before allowing access to content deemed harmful to minors. This includes material that is sexually explicit or lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors. The bill sets forth a definition of 'material harmful to minors' and establishes what constitutes obscene material, specifically targeting content that may appeal to prurient interests.
The bill has sparked discussions regarding privacy and the effectiveness of age verification methods. Critics might argue that the bill could infringe on civil liberties by requiring intrusive age verification processes, while supporters assert that such measures are necessary to safeguard minors. Additionally, the clear definitions established for what constitutes harmful or obscene material are also points of contention, as they can vary significantly based on personal and community standards. There are concerns that these definitions may lead to overreach and unjust censorship of content that is not genuinely harmful.
Furthermore, SB 130 includes provisions that protect internet service providers, ensuring that they cannot be held liable for content accessed unless they are the source of the harmful material. This safeguard could have implications for how businesses create and manage their content, as they seek to comply with the stringent requirements enforced by the state. The bill’s enforcement mechanisms, which allow for civil actions without prior administrative remedies, also raise questions about the potential for increased litigation in the digital space concerning online content distribution.