Wisconsin Senate Bill SB164

Wisconsin 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/27/25
• Refer: 3/27/25
• Report Pass: 4/10/25
• Engrossed: 4/22/25
• Refer: 5/27/25
• Refer: 6/20/25

Caption

Use of certified seed potatoes in planting potatoes and providing a penalty. (FE)

Impact

One of the significant changes under SB164 is the modification of penalties for non-compliance. Previously, violations of the seed certification requirements resulted in relatively low forfeitures, but the new bill escalates these penalties significantly. Growers found in violation of the updated regulations may face forfeitures of up to $5,000, alongside additional fines for every acre planted unlawfully. These changes underscore a stronger regulatory approach to maintaining the health of potato crops in Wisconsin while aiming to broaden the flexibility afforded to farmers in using seed potatoes.

Summary

Senate Bill 164, introduced in the 2025 legislative session, seeks to amend the regulations surrounding the use of certified seed potatoes in Wisconsin. This bill primarily addresses the conditions under which the state's Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) can waive certain requirements for growers planting five or more acres of potatoes. It allows DATCP to impose restrictions related to geographic boundaries when granting waivers, thereby directly influencing how growers manage their planting decisions based on certified seed availability and disease threats.

Contention

Discussions surrounding SB164 may center on the balance between regulatory enforcement and agricultural flexibility. While proponents of the bill argue that these measures are essential to prevent the spread of diseases in potato crops and protect the state's agricultural economy, critics may express concerns regarding the limitations placed on farmers, particularly in times of seed shortages. Additionally, the increased financial penalties could disproportionately affect smaller farms that struggle to comply with stringent regulations. As the bill proceeds, it will likely evoke debates about the role of government oversight in farming practices and the implications of such regulations on local agricultural communities.