West Virginia 2022 Regular Session

West Virginia House Bill HB4305

Introduced
1/20/22  

Caption

Relating to power generating plant sites

Impact

By repealing the ban on nuclear construction, HB 4305 could lead to significant shifts in energy policy within the state, potentially increasing investments in nuclear energy projects and diversifying the state's energy portfolio. Furthermore, the bill's provisions for consumer rate relief bonds aim to provide a framework for electric utilities to finance or refinance existing debt tied to older coal plants. This financing method could help stabilize electricity rates for consumers while maintaining operational coal-fired plants to support the local economy.

Summary

House Bill 4305 aims to stimulate energy generation in West Virginia by repealing the state’s ban on the construction of nuclear power plants and allowing for the securitization of costs related to prematurely retired coal-fired generating plants. This legislation also seeks to revise consumer rate relief bonds, enabling electric utility companies to mitigate financial impacts and support local job maintenance in the energy sector. It acknowledges the transition in the electric utility industry due to environmental concerns and technological advancements, advocating for diversified energy solutions.

Sentiment

The general sentiment towards HB 4305 appears to be cautiously optimistic among proponents who view it as a necessary step towards modernizing the state's energy infrastructure and addressing economic challenges related to coal reliance. However, there are concerns and criticisms regarding potential environmental impacts and the push for nuclear energy among those who advocate for renewable energy sources. This polarization reflects broader national debates on energy production methods and sustainability.

Contention

Key points of contention surrounding HB 4305 include the potential environmental consequences of expanding nuclear energy and whether the benefits of updating coal-fired plants through securitization outweigh the risks of promoting non-renewable energy sources. Critics argue that public funds could be better allocated towards renewable energy initiatives rather than maintaining aging coal infrastructure. These discussions highlight the tension between preserving jobs in traditional energy sectors and transitioning towards more sustainable energy solutions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

WV HB4904

Relating to power generating plant sites

WV HB2420

Relating to power generating plant sites

WV HB2258

Relating to power generating plant sites

WV SB818

Power Generation and Consumption Act of 2025

WV HB3410

Power generation facility regulation and property taxation of power generation facilities

WV SB216

Relating to nuclear-fueled thermal power plants.

WV HB3062

Relating generally to coal fired energy plants and wind power

WV HB3446

Clarifying the powers and duties of Public Service Commission as to electric generating facilities

WV HB2959

Relating to the financing of environmental pollution control equipment for coal-fired power plants

WV HB2175

Relating generally to coal fired energy plants and wind power

Similar Bills

WV HB3308

Authorizing PSC consider and issue financing orders to certain utilities to permit the recovery of certain costs through securitization via consumer rate relief bonds

WV SB564

Allowing PSC to authorize recovery of certain costs by utilities through issuance of consumer rate relief bonds

WV HB2258

Relating to power generating plant sites

WV HB5372

Relating to repeal of severability provisions

VA HB2621

Phase I Utilities; financing for certain securitized asset costs, biennial rate reviews.

VA SB1076

Phase I Utilities; securitized asset costs, rate increases in certain months prohibited, etc.

VA HB1777

Phase I Utilities; financing for certain deferred fuel costs, biennial reviews, etc.

VA SB1075

Phase I Utilities; financing for certain deferred fuel costs, biennial reviews, etc.