West Virginia 2024 Regular Session

West Virginia House Bill HB5372

Introduced
1/30/24  

Caption

Relating to repeal of severability provisions

Impact

The implications of HB 5372 on state laws are significant. Its passage would remove certain clauses that safeguard the enforcement of laws when parts of them are found invalid or unconstitutional. This could inadvertently lead to broader consequences, as entire regulations might be struck down due to a minor defect. Supporters of the bill argue that simplifying the legal language will enhance clarity and improve the legal environment for businesses and citizens. However, critics warn that removing these protections may expose vulnerable areas of law to litigation challenges, complicating the legal landscape rather than simplifying it.

Summary

House Bill 5372 aims to repeal several provisions related to severability within the West Virginia Code. The bill seeks to eliminate redundancy in regulations and legal stipulations that may have become outdated or unnecessary. By revoking these provisions, the bill intends to streamline state laws, making them more straightforward and accessible. This is part of a broader effort to reform legislative processes and reduce confusion in legal interpretations, especially for those engaging with state policies in the context of local governance and business operations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 5372 appears to be mixed. Proponents, largely from the Republican side, regard it as a forward-thinking legislative reform that will reduce government overreach and enhance efficiency. They champion the idea of a more coherent legal code that would make regulatory compliance easier for businesses. Conversely, detractors, including some legal experts and opposition lawmakers, worry that the repeal of severability provisions could negate essential legal protections, resulting in increased instability and unpredictability within the legislative framework.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention regarding HB 5372 revolves around its potential to undermine legal stability in West Virginia. Opponents highlight that the severability clauses offer critical protection for laws to remain effective, even when parts are challenged in court. The absence of these protections might lead to significant legal voids, as entire laws could be struck down due to the invalidity of a single component. This concern could significantly impact various sectors, particularly those heavily reliant on regulatory clarity and compliance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

WV SB694

Relating to oil and gas conservation

WV HB2853

Provide for the unitization of interests in drilling units in connection with shallow horizontal oil or gas wells

WV HB2132

Relating to horizontal well control standards

WV HB4305

Relating to power generating plant sites

WV HB3308

Authorizing PSC consider and issue financing orders to certain utilities to permit the recovery of certain costs through securitization via consumer rate relief bonds

WV SB564

Allowing PSC to authorize recovery of certain costs by utilities through issuance of consumer rate relief bonds

CA SB901

Wildfires.

MI HB6165

Natural resources: sand dunes; regulation of critical dune development; revise. Amends secs. 35301, 35302, 35303, 35304, 35305, 35306,35308, 35309, 35310, 35311, 35312, 35313, 35314, 35315, 35316,35319, 35321, 35323 & 35324 of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.35301 et seq.); adds secs. 35304b & 35326 & repeals secs. 35307, 35311a, 35311b, 35317, 35320, 35322 & 35325 of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.35307 et seq.).