West Virginia House Bill HB2643

West Virginia 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/17/23
• Refer: 1/17/23
• Refer: 1/25/23

Caption

Authorizing the Department of Environmental Protection to promulgate a legislative rule relating to control of ozone season nitrogen oxides emissions

Impact

If enacted, HB 2643 would significantly influence state regulations related to emissions and air quality management. It grants the Department of Environmental Protection clearer authority to enforce rules and measures that are critical for controlling nitrogen oxides—known contributors to ozone formation. This regulation is particularly pertinent as it aligns with federal air quality standards and aims to enhance compliance with environmental laws. The bill's passage may lead to a more robust framework for monitoring and controlling emissions, ultimately benefiting public health by aiming for cleaner air.

Summary

House Bill 2643 aims to enhance air quality management in West Virginia by authorizing the Department of Environmental Protection to implement a legislative rule concerning the control of ozone season nitrogen oxides emissions. This legislative action reflects the state's commitment to addressing air pollution and its impact on public health and the environment. By establishing rules governing nitrogen oxides emissions during the ozone season, the bill seeks to mitigate adverse environmental effects and improve air quality across the state, especially during peak pollution periods.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2643 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among environmental advocates and public health officials who emphasize the need for stricter controls on pollutants. Supporters argue that the bill reflects proactive measures to combat air quality issues linked to ozone pollution. However, concerns from some industry stakeholders about the regulatory burden and potential economic impacts could evoke mixed sentiments, highlighting a balance that must be struck between ecological sustainability and economic viability.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise concerning the implementation and enforcement of the legislative rules set forth by the bill. While advocates tout its potential benefits for environmental and public health, opponents may argue about the feasibility of stringent regulations and express concerns regarding potential impacts on industries involved in activities that contribute to nitrogen oxide emissions. Such debates underscore the ongoing balancing act in environmental legislation—between protecting air quality and accommodating economic interests.