West Virginia 2024 Regular Session

West Virginia House Bill HB4196

Introduced
1/10/24  
Refer
1/10/24  

Caption

Relating to municipal home rule appeals

Impact

The proposed alterations under HB 4196 would have significant implications for the powers and functions of municipal governments in West Virginia. By formally instituting a method for appealing municipal ordinances to the Intermediate Court of Appeals, the bill fundamentally alters the dynamics of local governance. The legislation not only clarifies who is eligible to appeal but also outlines the procedures for such appeals, potentially empowering residents to hold municipalities accountable for ordinances that they believe infringe upon their rights or violate the law. A special revenue fund, known as the Home Rule Appeal Escrow Fund, is also established to handle municipal sales taxes collected during the appeals process.

Summary

House Bill 4196 aims to amend the Code of West Virginia to outline specific provisions for municipal home rule appeals, establishing clear guidelines for the appeal process related to ordinances enacted by participating municipalities. The bill proposes that any individual subject to jurisdiction by a home rule municipality, such as taxpayers or users of municipal services, can file appeals against ordinances they believe violate state law. This legislative change is intended to streamline the appeals process, providing an avenue for residents to challenge local governance decisions more effectively.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HB 4196 is mixed, with proponents arguing that it reinforces democratic principles by giving residents the power to contest local ordinances. They feel that this increase in local accountability can enhance government transparency and responsiveness. Conversely, there are concerns among opponents who fear that this bill could undermine local governance by allowing state-level oversight over municipal decisions, potentially leading to state overreach into local matters.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention surrounding HB 4196 revolves around the balance of power between local municipalities and the state. Critics worry that enabling appeals to a state-level court could hinder municipalities' autonomous decision-making and might lead to a decrease in innovative local governance procedures. In a context of growing complexity in municipal governance, the bill has sparked debates on whether such a legal framework promotes or restricts local flexibility in addressing community-specific issues.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

WV HB3279

Relating to municipal home rule appeals

WV SB652

Modifying Municipal Home Rule appeals

WV HB3537

Relating to granting the Intermediate Court of Appeals jurisdiction to hear certified questions

WV HB3391

Establishing filing deadlines for appeals of property tax valuations and issues involving property tax classification and taxability to the West Virginia Office of Tax Appeals

WV HB2006

Relating to reorganizing the Department of Health and Human Resources

WV HB3471

Relating to the appellate court for appeals of level 3 decisions issued by the Public Employees Grievance Board

WV HB3206

To establish a system to remediate fiscal emergencies of local governments, and to modernize the process for dissolution of municipal corporations in this State.

WV HB2868

Establishing the Municipal Home Rule Program

WV SB126

Reorganizing DHHR

WV HB3182

Relating generally to mental health treatment

Similar Bills

CA SB1200

Enforcement of judgments: renewal and interest.

CA SB642

Civil actions: renewal of judgments.

CA SB261

Division of Labor Standards Enforcement: orders, decisions, and awards.

CA SB616

Enforcement of money judgments: exemptions.

CA SB298

Enforcement of money judgments: exemptions.

CA AB2339

Deferred entry of judgment.

CA AB774

Civil actions: enforcement of judgments.

CA SB1477

Enforcement of judgments: wage garnishment.