West Virginia 2025 Regular Session

West Virginia House Bill HB2267

Introduced
2/12/25  
Refer
2/12/25  
Engrossed
3/10/25  
Refer
3/11/25  
Refer
3/11/25  
Report Pass
4/3/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Refer
4/12/25  

Caption

Authorizing Department of Revenue to Promulgate Legislative Rules

Impact

The bill encompasses new provisions regarding the operation of distilleries, mini-distilleries, and micro-distilleries, including regulations that potentially expand their sales capabilities. Furthermore, provisions concerning the taxation of various goods, including drugs and medical equipment, may create a more favorable economic environment for healthcare and related industries. Notably, the legislation also suggests changes to how local municipalities can regulate sidewalk dining permits tied to alcohol service, potentially reshaping how alcohol is served in community restaurants and outdoor public spaces.

Summary

House Bill 2267 aims to empower various agencies within the Department of Revenue in West Virginia to establish legislative rules governing a broad range of areas, including alcohol sales, Medicare Supplement Insurance, and sports wagering. This legislation facilitates the promulgation of rules that affect both individual consumers and businesses, notably in the alcohol and taxation sectors, thereby influencing how these products are regulated and sold throughout the state. By streamlining and clarifying the rule-making processes, the bill seeks to promote economic growth and efficiency within the state's regulatory framework.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HB 2267 appears to be generally favorable among those who advocate for reduced regulatory burdens on businesses, with supporters arguing that the bill enhances operational freedoms for establishments involved in the sale of alcohol and the provision of healthcare-related services. However, there are concerns from some local governance advocates who fear this consolidation of power at the state level might undermine local decision-making authority, especially in areas pertinent to community-specific needs and public health considerations.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the extent to which the bill centralizes regulatory authority, particularly affecting how local authorities manage alcohol regulations and health insurance oversight. Critics may argue that removing the ability of local governments to tailor rules to unique community needs could lead to undesirable outcomes, while advocates propose it fosters a cohesive regulatory approach that could enhance business operations across West Virginia. The balance between state and local authority remains a key issue within the discussions surrounding the bill.

Companion Bills

WV SB347

Similar To Insurance Commissioner rule relating to Medicare Supplement Insurance

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.