To require DOH, when abandoning a right of way, to notify the legislative representatives in the county or counties in which this right of way is located via email and first class mail in addition to publication in the newspaper
The implementation of HB 2390 is expected to bolster local governance by ensuring that state-level actions regarding road closures or changes are communicated to local representatives, empowering them to advocate on behalf of their communities. This could lead to better alignment between state decisions and local needs, potentially enhancing public safety and community surveillance over highway infrastructures. Additionally, it can provide a platform for local representatives to voice their constituents' concerns during legislative processes.
House Bill 2390 aims to amend and reenact a provision in the Code of West Virginia, specifically regarding the responsibilities of the West Virginia Commissioner of Highways. The bill mandates that when the Commissioner of Highways decides to discontinue, abandon, or close a road or highway, they must notify the legislative representatives of the relevant county or counties through email and first-class mail. This notification would be in addition to the existing requirement for notification by publishing a Class I legal advertisement. The goal of this bill is to increase transparency and ensure that local authorities are informed and engaged in decisions that affect their constituents.
The sentiment surrounding HB 2390 appears to be favorable among those who prioritize local governance and community involvement. Supporters argue that such measures are essential for fostering collaboration between state and local governments. However, there may be concerns from some factions regarding the potential bureaucratic burden this notification system could impose on the Commissioner’s office and if such notifications will lead to substantive changes or merely serve as a formality.
One notable point of contention regarding HB 2390 is the balance between state authority and local governance. While the bill seeks to empower local legislators by keeping them informed, critics may argue that constant notifications could lead to delays in decision-making processes and complicate the management of highway-related issues. It raises questions about how effectively local representatives can engage with the process and whether this measure could unintentionally hinder the timely management of state road matters.