West Virginia 2025 Regular Session

West Virginia House Bill HB3501

Introduced
3/18/25  

Caption

Relating to residential real estate transactions

Impact

If enacted, HB 3501 would significantly impact the real estate regulatory framework in West Virginia by eliminating wholesaling as a legal avenue for property transactions. This move is expected to streamline the process by ensuring that transactions are handled by licensed real estate professionals, thereby enhancing consumer protection. The Real Estate Commission is tasked to handle rulings regarding any violations of this new provision, ensuring compliance and providing oversight in a state where previously unregulated wholesaling practices may have raised concerns among stakeholders.

Summary

House Bill 3501, known as the West Virginia Abolishment of Wholesaling Act, seeks to abolish the practice of wholesaling in real estate transactions within the state. The bill defines wholesaling as the act of entering an agreement to earn a profit from the transfer of or equitable interest in residential real property, which typically includes properties with fewer than five dwelling units. By prohibiting wholesaling, the bill intends to protect consumers from potential risks associated with this practice, such as contract cancellations and tricky negotiations that can arise during residential sales.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 3501 appears to be cautiously optimistic among proponents of consumer protection in real estate markets. Supporters argue that abolishing wholesaling can prevent unscrupulous practices that might exploit vulnerable home sellers and buyers. However, there remains a level of skepticism regarding the overall effectiveness of this legislation in improving transparency and safety in property transactions, as some stakeholders are concerned about limiting market opportunities for individuals wanting to engage in real estate investment.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implications of completely prohibiting wholesaling, which some view as unnecessarily restrictive. Critics contend that the bill may inadvertently limit access to homeownership opportunities for those who could benefit from flexible arrangements often associated with wholesaling. Additionally, there are debates on the potential for reduced participation in the real estate market, which could affect pricing and availability of housing options in the region. The law aims to facilitate a more regulated industry, but the balance between regulation and market freedom remains a challenging aspect of this legislative change.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1317

Asset forfeiture: human trafficking.

NM HB295

Tax On Property Owned By Nm Reta

NM SB112

Higher Ed Housing Facility Property Tax

TX HB2428

Relating to the adoption of the Texas Uniform Disclaimer of Property Interests Act.

MI HB4034

Probate: trusts; uniform statutory rule against perpetuities; revise to reflect limitation of the personal property trust perpetuities act to certain property. Amends secs. 3 & 5 of 1988 PA 418 (MCL 554.73 & 554.75). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4033'25

TX SB994

Relating to the adoption of the Texas Uniform Disclaimer of Property Interests Act.

CA AB1029

Statements of financial interest: digital financial assets.

CA AB603

Asset forfeiture: human trafficking.