West Virginia 2025 Regular Session

West Virginia House Bill HCR8

Introduced
2/13/25  
Refer
2/13/25  
Refer
3/12/25  
Report Pass
3/17/25  
Engrossed
3/18/25  
Refer
3/19/25  
Refer
3/19/25  
Report Pass
4/2/25  
Enrolled
4/2/25  

Caption

PFC Lester E. Maynard Memorial Bridge

Impact

Should HCR8 pass, it would officially designate the bridge currently known as Whitman Creek Box Beam as a memorial site. This makes a significant statement about local and state efforts to honor military veterans, particularly those who served during the Vietnam War. The act may inspire similar resolutions in the future to recognize local heroes, thus reinforcing the importance of community remembrance. The requested action would involve the Division of Highways, highlighting the collaboration between legislative and local government entities in recognizing national service.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution 8 (HCR8) is a commemorative resolution introduced to honor the late PFC Lester E. Maynard by naming an existing bridge in Logan County after him. PFC Maynard, who served in the Vietnam War, displayed extraordinary bravery during combat, risking his own life to protect his fellow soldiers. The resolution aims to acknowledge Maynard's sacrifice and service, reflecting a broader effort to honor veterans in the state. The proposal includes the installation of signage identifying the bridge as the 'U.S. Army PFC Lester E. Maynard Memorial Bridge'.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HCR8 is predominantly positive, with support for honoring a veteran whose life exemplified bravery and selflessness. Legislators and constituents alike may view the resolution as a meaningful way to remember and respect military service. The resolution is likely to draw bipartisan support, given the universal recognition of service members' sacrifices, especially amongst those from the local community.

Contention

As with many memorial resolutions, potential points of contention could arise about the selection criteria for memorializing individuals or the allocation of resources for signage. While likely to be supported broadly in this case, questions around how names are decided and the implications for current or historical figures represent areas for public discussion. Concerns might also arise regarding costs associated with the signage and the responsibilities of local governments in maintaining it.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.