Requesting Joint Committee on Government and Finance study enhancements to the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection’s Reclamation of Abandoned and Dilapidated Properties Program
The impact of HCR98 on state laws could be substantial, particularly regarding local government's roles and responsibilities in property remediation. The proposed study aims to evaluate how proceeds from the sale of remediated properties and fines from property maintenance violations can be reinvested into local remediation efforts. This might lead to alterations in existing laws that govern financial obligations for local governments involved in these programs, thereby fostering a more collaborative approach between state and local authorities.
HCR98 is a resolution that requests the Joint Committee on Government and Finance to conduct a comprehensive study aimed at enhancing the Reclamation of Abandoned and Dilapidated Properties Program administered by the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WV DEP). The resolution highlights the ongoing challenges faced by West Virginia communities regarding the presence of abandoned and dilapidated properties, which are seen as significant impediments to public health, safety, and economic development. The bill stresses the need for targeted strategies to incentivize the redevelopment of these properties to help alleviate the state's notable housing shortages.
The general sentiment around HCR98 appears to be supportive among those concerned about urban redevelopment and addressing housing shortages. Many view it as a proactive step towards not only revitalizing communities but also enhancing economic opportunities through efficient use of resources and incentives for redevelopment. However, potential contention might arise regarding the extent of financial commitments required from local governments, as this could place additional burdens on municipalities already facing fiscal challenges.
Notable points of contention center around the requirements for local governments to engage financially in remediation efforts. While proponents advocate for local accountability and investment, critics may argue about the practicality of imposing such obligations amidst existing budget constraints. The discussion surrounding the incentives to encourage private redevelopment, which includes tax relief and cost-effective housing solutions, may also provoke differing opinions on feasibility and implementation.